On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:36:55 +0000 (UTC),
Constance Vigilant <anyoneleft@arthurandersen.com> wrote:
>
> "Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message
> news:3fe05c9f$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
<snip>
>> Thanks for sharing your religious opinions with us.
>>
>> Why should anyone pay any more attention to your religious opinions than
>> they should to mine or my nexy door neighbor's or my car mechanic's?
>
> Do you, like, think this a good question, or something?
>
> You do seem to ask it rather a lot.
>
> You go ahead and post your sexy neighbour's opinions, I don't mind.
What he's asking is very important within the context of how evolutionary
theory is viewed and taught. You see, we have some Christians who accept
evolution, and we have some Christians that do not. A number of groups
populated by Christians who do not accept evolution want to force the
non-scientific notion of special creation (largely now through its stealth
version known as Intelligent Design) into my children's science classroom.
Since evolutionary theory is fundementally agnostic, like all scientific
theories, it does not attempt to say anything about your god, any anyone's
god or gods. However, it appears that many Christians who do not accept
evolution greatly desire to have their religious opinions foisted upon
children who are gaining an education through the public system.
In science, there are objective ways of measuring a claim. Thus, claims
like "populations change over time" or "water is made up of two atoms of
hydrogen and one atom of oxygen" can be evaluated purely on their merits as
they explain and incorporate the evidence.
Religious opinions are something else entirely. Historically, there has
been no way to objectively measure any religious claim. Now, before you
start on about "Christians must go by what the Bible says", history is also
full of fierce theological battles (sometimes spreading to the literal
battlefield) between groups with even modestly different interpretations of
Scripture.
Virtually every Christian I have ever met (and I was one myself for a number
of years) will state that some parts of the Bible are not to be taken
literally. However, when it comes to evaluating the claims by two or more
Christians who have opposing views of what is literal and what is
metaphorical, there is no external, objective standard. The only two
solutions to the problem that Christianity has ever been able to come up
with is either schism or suppression, neither of which actually solve the
problem as to which interpretation is the correct one.
When someone like Jason Gastrich comes along, attempting to foist his
religious opinions on us as being *THE* opinions, we see this endless debate
played out again. If it was purely a sectarian battle, I wouldn't mind. I
have only a passing interest nowadays on the goings on of various churches.
However, Jason Gastrich has a much more expansive net. For him a few
particular scientific theories, which are not contested in any fundemental
way by virtually every person with the education and training to
appropriately evaluate them, represent a threat to his claims of religious
certitude.
Jason is not alone in this. There are many on Usenet, and even more out in
the real world who view evolutionary theory, Big Bang cosmology, geology and
paleontology (to name a few scientific disciplines) as direct threats to
their particular interpretations of what parts of the Bible are to be taken
literally and what parts are meant as metaphor. Rather than keeping this
debate in its appropriate place; namely the churches, Biblical literalists
are trying to reach into the high schools, colleges, universities and even
the halls of power.
So, when Lenny asks in his constant, annoying way why your religious opinion
is any more important than his mechanic's or the police person down the
street, this is why.
--
Aaron Clausen
tao_of_cow/\alberni.net (replace /\ with @)
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 |
150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 |
180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 |
210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 |
|