| Re: sets as requested |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| '-Cos.M0S,=.,np:-F4,9 (Cos'm0s.@4th/eplanetfr0mthesun.net.(moved)>) |
2006/08/12 08:09 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!t4!artnm!t1!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!newspeer.monmouth.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!fe03.news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.fan.snuffles
Subject: Re: sets as requested
From: "'-Cos.M0S,=.,np:-F4,9" <Cos'm0s.@4th/eplanetfr0mthesun.net.(moved)>>
References: <2j7Dg.431872$vu2.122094@fe05.news.easynews.com> <oy8Dg.287767$1Q1.25717@fe03.news.easynews.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.12.116.203;posting-account 118.69.96.31
MIME-Version: 1.0 Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers and offending article otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 93
Message-ID: <uilDg.294030$1Q1.95639@fe03.news.easynews.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:09:30 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.snuffles:44
movie watcher <what.is@email.not> wrote in news:oy8Dg.287767$1Q1.25717
@fe03.news.easynews.com:
> "'-Cos.M0S,=.,np:-F4,9" <Cos'm0s.@4th/eplanetfr0mthesun.net.(moved)>>
> wrote in news:2j7Dg.431872$vu2.122094@fe05.news.easynews.com:
>
>> Fill sets as requested
>>
>> Cosmos
>>
>> PS if you have a further list I'l see what I can do but no promises!
>>
>
> I am deeply, deeply grateful to you, Cosmos. They all came through
> beautifully.
> A virtual kiss and hug is hereby sent (you may however be relieved that
> you're receiving a virtual one, an IRL one might not be so pleasant :)
>
> I did actually have some of the scans you posted now, but figured it
> would be easier to post complete sets than individual numbers.
> Just as well, because some of your posts proved to have higher
> resolution that the copies I already had (and none of mine had higher
> resolution than what you posted).
> Again, thanks, and a deep bow.
>
> And how did you guess I had further requests? (blush)
> Actually, I do:
>
> JPP series (jpp0xxx):
> 350-351-358-426-454-457-459-466-467-472-474-492-493-494-496-503-504-507-
> 513-516-519-542-548-552-553-554-555-559-561-563-564-566-579-591-593-594-
> 609-612-613-624-634-703-718-731-812-886
>
> jpptb
> 203c-215
> (I know Johnie is reposting this set, but I fear the two I lack are
> nudes, and that he therefore will skip them)
>
> Remark
> jpp-rem: 519-576-577, 601 to 625, 627 to 680, 682-683-684-685-686-687-
> 688-689-692, 694 and higher
> rem: 46-90-196-199-225-403-405-406-409, 693 and higher
> rem-asia: 6-7, 19 and higher
>
> jpp-jk 42 and higher
> I have never seen a read-me file for this set, and don't know if there
> are more than 41 scans in the set. Nor do I know what it is.
>
> Beautiful Kids
> 396 to 406, 563 to 570, 604 to 610, 620 and higher.
> I know Johnie have reserved some of these for his homepage, and do not
> want you to violate that - I can wait for a good thing :)
> I did however notice you posted a couple of months back several higher
> resolution versions than what Johnie has posted on his homepage (No. 407
> to 562, inclusive, and No. 571) which made me wonder if you had more of
> the bk set at high resolution.
>
> And if you can please check what happened to FILM03 in the BP12
> couldn't find any dropped posts.
>
> I know I am asking a lot, especially as I have already have a very good
> day today (thumbs-up)
> I'll leave it to you if you prefer to post complete sets, individual
> numbers, or not at all.
> I am grateful either way.
>
> And a note for Spin:
> No, the BP sets Cosmos posted are not new, they were probably posted in
> 2001 or so by the original scanners, probably in abpb, and reposted by
> Johnie in the Fort in July/August 2003 (if my memory serves me right)
> Johnie posted a list of who the original scanners were, those that he
> remembered, but that list got lost in my hard disk crash.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>......
Hi Movie watcher
"And if you can please check what happened to FILM03 in the BP12
couldn't find any dropped posts"
I am afraid this one is missing from my archive, and most probable has
never been posted.
I will be happy to post the full sets of the series you have asked of
as It would be a nice project, though I may put them into Rar archive
split parts as it is kinder to posting limits unless you or others would
prefer them as separate posts?
LOL
Cosmos
|
|
|