In article <Xns983979E0F22CCromeonot@216.40.28.70>, Romeo
<cenobite@me.com> wrote:
> "::Y-Not::" <%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there> wrote in
> news:080920062340049684%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there:
>
> > In article <0001HW.C127628A007585F3F0284530@news.easynews.com>,
> > Morpheus <Morpheus@Deamland.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:55:11 -0700, C0s/Mos,=',np:-F4,9 wrote
> >> (in article <3FlMg.141412$TD2.123744@fe08.news.easynews.com>):
> >>
> >> > Morpheus <Morpheus@Deamland.org> wrote in
> >> > news:0001HW.C126088600246D3BF0284530@news.easynews.com:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 06:26:03 -0700, Y-Not:: wrote
> >> >> (in article <070920060924006491%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there>):
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Y Not
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> PS.
> >> >>> I don't want to be doing any of this.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Breathtaking.
> >> >>
> >> >> Another 2000 words of "I don't want to be doing any of this."
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Positively breathtaking.
> >> >>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .......
> >> >
> >> > Positively breathtaking. No not really, Haven't we become
> >> > accustomed to expect no less than this torrent of convoluted
> >> > garbage associated to? This self-proclaimed saviour of the boy
> >> > lover community! Anything less would be cause for concern.
> >> >
> >> > Cosmos
>
> great!. "torrent of convuluted garbage", "self-proclaimed saviour": the
> people here loves to compose that kind of sentences. very clever people
> here! So clever and hieratical people doesn't need to give reasons to
> attack, does them?
>
> many people fight on his way here, mr. cosmos, they doesn't need to
> consider themselves saviours (or post high-rated porn). Is their fight
> worst or better than yours?
>
>
>
>
> >>
> >> I suppose you're right. But less 'saviorism' would be more cause for
> >> celebration than cause for concern, though, don't you think?
>
> Another great sentence from "the lost kid", graduated in google psychology.
>
>
> >
> > So, what you two are saying is that you don't want me to help people?
> > That not only do you not want to do it yourself, you want me to stop
> > doing it too? That you don't want them to have the security help that
> > you don't care to provide yourself, and don't want me to provide it
> > either? And that you would celebrate the increased danger that would
> > put your fellow BLs in?
> > That sure isn't very charitable of you.
> > Actually, it's downright ah, bad.
> >
> > If you don't want me to remind you of all the good I do and you don't,
> > don't post to oppose me, that would prompt me to correct your lies.
> > One would think you might have thought of that. You also might try to
> > do some good yourself, instead of the opposite. Then you might have a
> > little credibility in this. Until then, when you do this you look
> > awfully bad, and against this community. Of course, such an obvious
> > thing should be easy for you to understand. So why don't you?
> >
> >
> > Y Not
> >
> >
> > PS.
> > Do you and Cosmos want to forget the help I've given directly to YOU?
> > And the things you may have benefited from others of my posts? Would
> > you rather I had never helped you? Would you rather I had helped no
> > one?
> > What will people think of you, who have seen me do this for you, and
> > for THEM? That you wish to be ungrateful, is as usual with the
> > selfish, but to oppose it means you want to cause others harm. Is this
> > what you really want people to see of you?
> >
>
> You shouldn't reply those words. You have nothing to demostrate. If people
> wants to know, they can just read.
>
>
>
>
> Let's finish this thread, ok?
>
>
> Best regards.
I am a counselor. I'm counseling them. It's my duty to help them see
their errors in what they are doing, and that what they do, doesn't do
what they think it does. I care about EVERYONE, including people who
dislike me. I don't want other people to think badly of them.
Y Not
--
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|