"::Y-Not::" <%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there> wrote in
news:080920062340049684%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there:
> In article <0001HW.C127628A007585F3F0284530@news.easynews.com>,
> Morpheus <Morpheus@Deamland.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:55:11 -0700, C0s/Mos,=',np:-F4,9 wrote
>> (in article <3FlMg.141412$TD2.123744@fe08.news.easynews.com>):
>>
>> > Morpheus <Morpheus@Deamland.org> wrote in
>> > news:0001HW.C126088600246D3BF0284530@news.easynews.com:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 06:26:03 -0700, Y-Not:: wrote
>> >> (in article <070920060924006491%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there>):
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Y Not
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> PS.
>> >>> I don't want to be doing any of this.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Breathtaking.
>> >>
>> >> Another 2000 words of "I don't want to be doing any of this."
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Positively breathtaking.
>> >>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .......
>> >
>> > Positively breathtaking. No not really, Haven't we become
>> > accustomed to expect no less than this torrent of convoluted
>> > garbage associated to? This self-proclaimed saviour of the boy
>> > lover community! Anything less would be cause for concern.
>> >
>> > Cosmos
great!. "torrent of convuluted garbage", "self-proclaimed saviour": the
people here loves to compose that kind of sentences. very clever people
here! So clever and hieratical people doesn't need to give reasons to
attack, does them?
many people fight on his way here, mr. cosmos, they doesn't need to
consider themselves saviours (or post high-rated porn). Is their fight
worst or better than yours?
>>
>> I suppose you're right. But less 'saviorism' would be more cause for
>> celebration than cause for concern, though, don't you think?
Another great sentence from "the lost kid", graduated in google psychology.
>
> So, what you two are saying is that you don't want me to help people?
> That not only do you not want to do it yourself, you want me to stop
> doing it too? That you don't want them to have the security help that
> you don't care to provide yourself, and don't want me to provide it
> either? And that you would celebrate the increased danger that would
> put your fellow BLs in?
> That sure isn't very charitable of you.
> Actually, it's downright ah, bad.
>
> If you don't want me to remind you of all the good I do and you don't,
> don't post to oppose me, that would prompt me to correct your lies.
> One would think you might have thought of that. You also might try to
> do some good yourself, instead of the opposite. Then you might have a
> little credibility in this. Until then, when you do this you look
> awfully bad, and against this community. Of course, such an obvious
> thing should be easy for you to understand. So why don't you?
>
>
> Y Not
>
>
> PS.
> Do you and Cosmos want to forget the help I've given directly to YOU?
> And the things you may have benefited from others of my posts? Would
> you rather I had never helped you? Would you rather I had helped no
> one?
> What will people think of you, who have seen me do this for you, and
> for THEM? That you wish to be ungrateful, is as usual with the
> selfish, but to oppose it means you want to cause others harm. Is this
> what you really want people to see of you?
>
You shouldn't reply those words. You have nothing to demostrate. If people
wants to know, they can just read.
Let's finish this thread, ok?
Best regards.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|