Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "::Y-Not::" <%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.smeagol
Subject: Re: I am being viciously FLAMED in a Scurrilous attack by Y-NOT.
Date: 8 Sep 2006 22:42:01 -0500
Organization: Can Help
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <080920062340049684%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there>
References: <k7gqf2p41l4vm5qoq2v1nd39as2fibslnm@4ax.com> <060920060702313039%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there> <uintf25vglhfii51fjsovkkmi9d38imvk7@4ax.com> <070920060924006491%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there> <0001HW.C126088600246D3BF0284530@news.easynews.com> <3FlMg.141412$TD2.123744@fe08.news.easynews.com> <0001HW.C127628A007585F3F0284530@news.easynews.com>
Reply-To: ::Y Not::
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User_Agent: Thoth/1.7.2 (Great Mac Program!)
X-No-Archive: yes
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.smeagol:698
In article <0001HW.C127628A007585F3F0284530@news.easynews.com>,
Morpheus <Morpheus@Deamland.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:55:11 -0700, C0s/Mos,=',np:-F4,9 wrote
> (in article <3FlMg.141412$TD2.123744@fe08.news.easynews.com>):
>
> > Morpheus <Morpheus@Deamland.org> wrote in
> > news:0001HW.C126088600246D3BF0284530@news.easynews.com:
> >
> >> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 06:26:03 -0700, Y-Not:: wrote
> >> (in article <070920060924006491%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there>):
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Y Not
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> PS.
> >>> I don't want to be doing any of this.
> >>
> >>
> >> Breathtaking.
> >>
> >> Another 2000 words of "I don't want to be doing any of this."
> >>
> >>
> >> Positively breathtaking.
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .......
> >
> > Positively breathtaking. No not really, Haven't we become accustomed to
> > expect no less than this torrent of convoluted garbage associated to?
> > This self-proclaimed saviour of the boy lover community!
> > Anything less would be cause for concern.
> >
> > Cosmos
> >
> >
> >
>
> I suppose you're right. But less 'saviorism' would be more cause for
> celebration than cause for concern, though, don't you think?
>
So, what you two are saying is that you don't want me to help people?
That not only do you not want to do it yourself, you want me to stop
doing it too? That you don't want them to have the security help that
you don't care to provide yourself, and don't want me to provide it
either? And that you would celebrate the increased danger that would
put your fellow BLs in?
That sure isn't very charitable of you.
Actually, it's downright ah, bad.
If you don't want me to remind you of all the good I do and you don't,
don't post to oppose me, that would prompt me to correct your lies. One
would think you might have thought of that. You also might try to do
some good yourself, instead of the opposite. Then you might have a
little credibility in this. Until then, when you do this you look
awfully bad, and against this community. Of course, such an obvious
thing should be easy for you to understand. So why don't you?
Y Not
PS.
Do you and Cosmos want to forget the help I've given directly to YOU?
And the things you may have benefited from others of my posts? Would
you rather I had never helped you? Would you rather I had helped no
one?
What will people think of you, who have seen me do this for you, and
for THEM? That you wish to be ungrateful, is as usual with the selfish,
but to oppose it means you want to cause others harm. Is this what you
really want people to see of you?
--
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|