On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:55:11 -0700, C0s/Mos,=',np:-F4,9 wrote
(in article <3FlMg.141412$TD2.123744@fe08.news.easynews.com>):
> Morpheus <Morpheus@Deamland.org> wrote in
> news:0001HW.C126088600246D3BF0284530@news.easynews.com:
>
>> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 06:26:03 -0700, Y-Not:: wrote
>> (in article <070920060924006491%%+15$-Y-Not@here-and.there>):
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Y Not
>>>
>>>
>>> PS.
>>> I don't want to be doing any of this.
>>
>>
>> Breathtaking.
>>
>> Another 2000 words of "I don't want to be doing any of this."
>>
>>
>> Positively breathtaking.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .......
>
> Positively breathtaking. No not really, Haven't we become accustomed to
> expect no less than this torrent of convoluted garbage associated to?
> This self-proclaimed saviour of the boy lover community!
> Anything less would be cause for concern.
>
> Cosmos
>
>
>
I suppose you're right. But less 'saviorism' would be more cause for
celebration than cause for concern, though, don't you think?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|