In article <Xns98376EB6BD412tonycapuleto@216.40.28.70>, Romeo
<cenobite@me.com> wrote:
> >Which leads on to another point, and one so obvious that I am surprised
> >that a psychologist of his standing should overlook it in his summary
> of
> >who actually posted the trouble making pics. There is a fifth possible
> >explanation which Mr. Not conveniently fails to notice: He himself
> >posted the pics. He posted them using the same program as Mephi uses in
> >order to create suspicion. (And just in case others did not notice that
> >fact, he made sure the program was brought to everyone's attention in
> >his masterly summing up.) He would have posted the pics in the certain
> >knowledge that Mephi would respond by expressing grief at the intrusion
> >into a.f.smeagol, and Mr. Not could then turn on the upset Mephi to
> >lambast him with "now you know how it feels". He is as tricky as Dicky.
>
>
>
> > Concise and to the point, although you did forget to ask the question
> > "What else would one expect of the fraud that is Y-Not?".
> > In Y-Not we have a so called Priest in at least 3 world Religions, and
> > yet by his own admission is a non-believer in any of them. If one
> > would deceive those who would ordain one to be a Priest, is there any
> > level that he would not stoop?.
> > Nit has always been a "cloaked" troll, why ever would anyone expect
> > him to be honest and "honourable" now. Never happen!
I deceived no one. I honestly thought I had a calling in those times.
It was only later that I realized that I hadn't. The world is full of
people who mature beyond their previously held beliefs. I see that you
haven't yet progressed very far on that path.
The first religion I was born into, and didn't have a choice but to be
highly educated in it, which automatically confers "ordination" when
one graduates from one of it's "seminaries".
The second religion, Buddhism, I chose.
The last religion that I was involved with, requires only a belief in
God. It is very accepting of people from other faiths. With this
description, some of you may recognize it.
By the way, I still have a belief in God, but not in "religion".
Now, does this look like deception to you?
Don't you just really ha.., ah, dislike it when your self-serving
antagonistic fantasies are exposes for the unfounded lies they are?
:-)
You just can't stand it that I'm actually a good and honest person,
despite your very mean spirited lying attempts at demonizing me. I
shouldn't (no one is perfect), but I do feel quite a lot of amusement
when sabotaging those dishonorable attempts, with more of the truth
than you can bear to accept.
I never lie. :-)
Oh, I almost forgot, there are some problems with the logic in your
accusations. Most of my antagonists maintain that I was never a cleric.
Therefore I couldn't have deceived them. But now you seem to believe
that I told the truth about that, which means that you now think I'm
not a liar. Doesn't this mean that if I tell you that I didn't deceive
anyone, you have to believe me now?
OK, don't worry, I don't expect you to be able to understand this kind
of logical reasoning. But some others might, and be amused by it.
>
> > And I have indeed been saddened to see how the groups have been
> > consistently disrupted by this nauseating, self-serving, strutting
> > popinjay whose interest in every appearance he makes begins & ends
> > with himself.
Oh, such a horrendous personal attack. Hey Romeo, isn't it amusing that
the writer of that doesn't know that he is describing himself? Happens
all the time!
He claims that I disrupt the groups, while he is disrupting them and
I'm asking him to stop that. Isn't that absolutely hilarious?
Note that he only opposes what he thinks he FEELS of my presence, and
wants to convince others to feel the same immature resentful way as he
does. But what is it that he resents? That I am respected by most in
these groups? That I successfully help people a lot, and that he
doesn't bother to do much of that? That he does a lot of willfully
wrong things and hates when that is exposed? Do you think, that out of
jealousy, he actually wants me to stop giving all the needed help I
give, that some visitors may not survive without, just because HE
personally dislikes me? Could he actually BE that self-centered and
selfish? Could he place his personal feelings above the very real needs
of his fellow BLs? Could he be that arrogant and, well, just plain
nasty?
Hopefully not, but it's up to him to show us he isn't. It's not looking
good for him at the moment.
>
>
>
>
> is not terrible when people just see what they wanna see?
> because when people just see what they wanna see, they can think what
> they wanna think.
I'm replying to you to show you that you are quite correct in your
assessment.
>
> be happy kids, while you can, because that formula doesn't work forever.
They don't care about that, as they live for the moment, and the false
feeling of power that this gives to their overly large egos.
>
> be happy, happy, happy. R.
I doubt that this actually makes them very happy. Satisfied, yes,
sometimes viciously joyful in their imagined victories, but truly
happy? No. Will they ever be? Not as they are going now. Still, one can
hope that they will see the error of their ways, and post to and about
others ONLY as they would have others post to and about them.
Arrogant eccentric bullies never accept that "Golden Rule" for
themselves. So, will these people?
Take care,
Y Not
"Sometimes the answers we are looking for,
are different from the answers we didn't know we needed."
--
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|