In article <4m4562pnmj8pbulq40gg14jl3j6mg4cj9t@4ax.com>, or whoever you
think I am <ooey@gooey.speeyooey> wrote:
> On 9 May 2006 20:42:02 -0500, "::Y-Not::" <%+14$-Y-Not@here-and.there>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <lhp1629b4vv2a8js88vfcf3adtc1i8no53@4ax.com>, Mephistopheles
> ><no-fixed@address.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 09 May 2006 14:04:15 GMT, "go||um (or whoever you think I am)"
> >> <ooey@gooey.speeyooey> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi:
> >> >
> >> >Please help abc. He seems to be suffering from paranoid delusions. He
> >> >thinks everyone is me, but as you know, I hardly ever post anymore. In
> >> >fact, I would not have even noticed had he not posted some wonderful
> >> >pics of new-star Jimmy (thank you thank you thank you).
> >> >
> >> >Have fun helping.
> >> >
> >> >-g:)
> >>
> >> Why would you be troubled so on abc's account?
> >>
> >> I would have honestly thought abc's opinion on this matter would have
> >> held no measurable significance for you. And at the same time I don't
> >> imagine YN's intercessory powers would carry much weight with abc.
> >>
> >> Or is there a sub-text here that escapes me? I assure you I come in
> >> friendship, & made my way on foot, having left my horse, Trigger,
> >> outside. LOL
> >>
> >> Mephi.........somewhat bemused.
> >
> >
> >For your un-bemusement...
> >
> >The impersonator posted as me in another group, to abc. abc then
> >accused Gollum of doing it. Here is my reply to that post, which
> >contains the other posts in the thread:
> >
> >[quote]
> >
> >Re: PING: abc
> >
> >In article <FqV7g.432719$7i1.115167@fe06.news.easynews.com>,
> >Hay-Bee-Sea <Hay-Bee-See@wobbleyou_ex_why_zee.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 7-May-2006, "::Y-Not::" <%+13$-Y-Not@here.com> posted:
> >>
> >> > Isn't it time you and I worked together, instead of agains our common
> >> > interests?
> >>
> >> I *once* made a mistaken apology to you, Gollum.
> >>
> >> Never again.
> >>
> >> May the present crackup you seem to be heading for, be the biggest and best
> >> ever and hopefully it will remove you and the big lumps of doggy-doo you
> >> keep trying to lay down for poor innocents to walk in.
> >>
> >> Crack up, Gollum! Please! Crack up!
> >>
> >> You never, *ever* fitted in as you tried to flit and dodge and alternate
> >> between playing the fool and playing the lump of dog shit you truly are,
> >> and
> >> you now prove your true worth with your forged posts. Do you remember your
> >> first ever forgery, Gollum? So long ago, so far away, and for you, in so
> >> much happier times. A lot of us realised right then just what you truly
> >> are.
> >>
> >> You ain't happy now, are you, G Man?
> >> --
> >> abc
> >
> >
> >How many times are you going to retract that week apology?
> >The one time you actually did something socially right, must still pain
> >you. Do you even know why?
> >
> >Psst:
> >Do you remember a BL poster named "birdie" (also sometimes "mike", but
> >there were more than one of those)? He used to do a lot of
> >impersonations. I caught him at it in my discussion group after he
> >posted as Ninja in the Fort, but didn't completely change his header
> >back for posting as "himself". He admitted it after I confronted him.
> >He was quite a disturbed individual. He STILL is.
> >
> >abc, you are wrong on two levels. Technical and social.
> >Gollum posts only through Easynews. The impersonator doesn't, and can't
> >completely coverup that he isn't. Ask Q about header comparison.
> >Gollum has never actually impersonated anyone to deceive, despite your
> >accusations. And he would absolutely NEVER even THINK of impersonating
> >ME! How could you even suspect he would? Where is your social
> >awareness? Have you no understanding of people at all?
> >
> >Gollum isn't a G-Man, and neither is the actual impersonator. But then,
> >YOU have acted more like one than any other Fort poster I know. How
> >many have you reported to their NSPs, or threatened to? Do you need to
> >accuse people, to try to throw the suspicion off of yourself?
> >As I've said many times before, be careful the tactics you use, lest
> >they be turned against you to greater affect. The attacker is most
> >vulnerable when he is attacking. That's why I don't.
> >
> >Do you remember the group in which I debated "loyalty"? There, Gollum
> >asked Meph to address this issue with you, but Meph seems to be
> >somewhat confused about it. Please go there and put the issue to rest.
> >This time you owe Gollum a BIG apology. Would it be too much to expect
> >such a thing?
> >
> >Who knows, but when Gollum is finished with his current VERY busy
> >situation in a few years, he may actually become a G-Man. He sure would
> >be a good one. And of course, this society could use another BL on the
> >inside (of LEA), right? :-)
> >
> >
> >Y Not
> >
> >
> > "Paying attention, costs you little.
> > Not paying attention, can cost you everything."
> >
> >[end quote]
>
> Is Lea a hottie? She's not fat, is she? Does she have kids? Boys?
>
> -g:)
Fat? Depends on how the finances go. A hottie? Well, if she doesn't
like you. And yes, she has LOTS of boys, but most of them are rather
macho, who like to point their equipment at people. But still, they do
have a fetish for bracelets, and those long hard dil- ah, sticks...
Hey, if you turn your head when they take a picture of you, does that
make you a profiler?
Y Not :-)
|
|