| Re: PING Y-NOT (the real one) |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| go||um (or whoever you think I am) (ooey@gooey.speeyooey) |
2006/05/10 18:29 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "go||um (or whoever you think I am)" <ooey@gooey.speeyooey>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.smeagol
Subject: Re: PING Y-NOT (the real one)
Message-ID: <4m4562pnmj8pbulq40gg14jl3j6mg4cj9t@4ax.com>
References: <68b16292ichgma75pac5c92qh74q4mes07@4ax.com> <lhp1629b4vv2a8js88vfcf3adtc1i8no53@4ax.com> <090520062140195244%%+14$-Y-Not@here-and.there>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 124
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:29:41 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.smeagol:560
On 9 May 2006 20:42:02 -0500, "::Y-Not::" <%+14$-Y-Not@here-and.there>
wrote:
>In article <lhp1629b4vv2a8js88vfcf3adtc1i8no53@4ax.com>, Mephistopheles
><no-fixed@address.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 09 May 2006 14:04:15 GMT, "go||um (or whoever you think I am)"
>> <ooey@gooey.speeyooey> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi:
>> >
>> >Please help abc. He seems to be suffering from paranoid delusions. He
>> >thinks everyone is me, but as you know, I hardly ever post anymore. In
>> >fact, I would not have even noticed had he not posted some wonderful
>> >pics of new-star Jimmy (thank you thank you thank you).
>> >
>> >Have fun helping.
>> >
>> >-g:)
>>
>> Why would you be troubled so on abc's account?
>>
>> I would have honestly thought abc's opinion on this matter would have
>> held no measurable significance for you. And at the same time I don't
>> imagine YN's intercessory powers would carry much weight with abc.
>>
>> Or is there a sub-text here that escapes me? I assure you I come in
>> friendship, & made my way on foot, having left my horse, Trigger,
>> outside. LOL
>>
>> Mephi.........somewhat bemused.
>
>
>For your un-bemusement...
>
>The impersonator posted as me in another group, to abc. abc then
>accused Gollum of doing it. Here is my reply to that post, which
>contains the other posts in the thread:
>
>[quote]
>
>Re: PING: abc
>
>In article <FqV7g.432719$7i1.115167@fe06.news.easynews.com>,
>Hay-Bee-Sea <Hay-Bee-See@wobbleyou_ex_why_zee.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7-May-2006, "::Y-Not::" <%+13$-Y-Not@here.com> posted:
>>
>> > Isn't it time you and I worked together, instead of agains our common
>> > interests?
>>
>> I *once* made a mistaken apology to you, Gollum.
>>
>> Never again.
>>
>> May the present crackup you seem to be heading for, be the biggest and best
>> ever and hopefully it will remove you and the big lumps of doggy-doo you
>> keep trying to lay down for poor innocents to walk in.
>>
>> Crack up, Gollum! Please! Crack up!
>>
>> You never, *ever* fitted in as you tried to flit and dodge and alternate
>> between playing the fool and playing the lump of dog shit you truly are, and
>> you now prove your true worth with your forged posts. Do you remember your
>> first ever forgery, Gollum? So long ago, so far away, and for you, in so
>> much happier times. A lot of us realised right then just what you truly are.
>>
>> You ain't happy now, are you, G Man?
>> --
>> abc
>
>
>How many times are you going to retract that week apology?
>The one time you actually did something socially right, must still pain
>you. Do you even know why?
>
>Psst:
>Do you remember a BL poster named "birdie" (also sometimes "mike", but
>there were more than one of those)? He used to do a lot of
>impersonations. I caught him at it in my discussion group after he
>posted as Ninja in the Fort, but didn't completely change his header
>back for posting as "himself". He admitted it after I confronted him.
>He was quite a disturbed individual. He STILL is.
>
>abc, you are wrong on two levels. Technical and social.
>Gollum posts only through Easynews. The impersonator doesn't, and can't
>completely coverup that he isn't. Ask Q about header comparison.
>Gollum has never actually impersonated anyone to deceive, despite your
>accusations. And he would absolutely NEVER even THINK of impersonating
>ME! How could you even suspect he would? Where is your social
>awareness? Have you no understanding of people at all?
>
>Gollum isn't a G-Man, and neither is the actual impersonator. But then,
>YOU have acted more like one than any other Fort poster I know. How
>many have you reported to their NSPs, or threatened to? Do you need to
>accuse people, to try to throw the suspicion off of yourself?
>As I've said many times before, be careful the tactics you use, lest
>they be turned against you to greater affect. The attacker is most
>vulnerable when he is attacking. That's why I don't.
>
>Do you remember the group in which I debated "loyalty"? There, Gollum
>asked Meph to address this issue with you, but Meph seems to be
>somewhat confused about it. Please go there and put the issue to rest.
>This time you owe Gollum a BIG apology. Would it be too much to expect
>such a thing?
>
>Who knows, but when Gollum is finished with his current VERY busy
>situation in a few years, he may actually become a G-Man. He sure would
>be a good one. And of course, this society could use another BL on the
>inside (of LEA), right? :-)
>
>
>Y Not
>
>
> "Paying attention, costs you little.
> Not paying attention, can cost you everything."
>
>[end quote]
Is Lea a hottie? She's not fat, is she? Does she have kids? Boys?
-g:)
|
|
|