On Jan 25, 2006, go||um wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:11:22 GMT, .J.A.F.O.
> <JAFO@observers.lounge.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 02:01:57 GMT, "go||um" <dhnlk@drtk.wfgj> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> It looks like EN is still carrying it, actually. If they weren't, you
>>> never would have seen the message to which you replied. You may not
>>> see this either. Of course, you'd be crazy to believe anything I say.
>>
>> good... you were paying attention.
>>
>>
>>> Just ask my old buddy JAFO.
>>
>> neither "old" nor your "buddy".
>
>
> Oh no, silly me, they weren't separate, but together.
>
> Old buddy, not old and a buddy. Like an old friend. You know, someone
> that was friendly with me in the past, but is not now, for whatever
> reason.
>
> Sorry for the mix-up.
>
> Take care,
>
> -g:)
>
>
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH
BLAH BLAH BLAH
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|