On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:04:06 GMT, .J.A.F.O.
<JAFO@observers.lounge.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:38:04 GMT, "go||um" <dhnlk@drtk.wfgj> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:11:22 GMT, .J.A.F.O.
>><JAFO@observers.lounge.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 02:01:57 GMT, "go||um" <dhnlk@drtk.wfgj> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>It looks like EN is still carrying it, actually. If they weren't, you
>>>>never would have seen the message to which you replied. You may not
>>>>see this either. Of course, you'd be crazy to believe anything I say.
>>>
>>>good... you were paying attention.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Just ask my old buddy JAFO.
>>>
>>>neither "old" nor your "buddy".
>>
>>
>>Oh no, silly me, they weren't separate, but together.
>>
>>Old buddy, not old and a buddy. Like an old friend. You know, someone
>>that was friendly with me in the past, but is not now, for whatever
>>reason.
>
>Nope..., sorry... not me.
Right. ;)
>
>
>>
>>Sorry for the mix-up.
>>
>>Take care,
>>
>>-g:)
>>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|