insane4boys <nevermind@notsaying.net> wrote in news:54d000b4$0$29459
$c3e8da3$e074e489@news.astraweb.com:
> The legal reasons behind the TYPE of CP I'm against have nothing to
> do with why I'm against it. I wouldn't download it even it it was
> legal. So, I'm not sure what your point is with showing me what
> Cosmos said.
>
>
Ah, well my " point" was simple!
I wished merely to highlight the fact that the reality of what "you"
regard as harmless child porn and what authorities now regard as child
porn are very dissimilar !
I did not want you or others to feel complacent that what you find as
acceptable
would find much countenance with LEA
Cosmos
Quote }
"First off, I must explain what I mean by child port. I mean stuff
where children are performing sexual acts on either each other
and/or with adults. Not non-sexual stuff where kids are on nudist
beaches or the various pay model sites."
|
|