To stop any further problems and my so-called irritating attitude I
have made this my last post. I have informed newscene that at the end
of the present period my account with them will not be re-newed.
Therefore there can be no further problems that can be attributed to
me. So for all you that have come to the conclusion that I am a stupid
old asshole, OK, you are entitled to your opinion. Personally I dont
give a shit any more.
On 15 Jul 2003 01:57:13 -0500, "::Y-Not::" <Y-Not@host.com> wrote:
>In article <3f174429.17869480.qmail@nym.alias.net>, :KidHacker NP-b54
><kidhacker@nym.alias.net> wrote:
>
>> On 14 Jul 2003 16:17:14 -0500, powdermonkey <> wrote:
>>
>> :>REMEMBER SENDING THIS when you said that the one I sent was the wrong
>> :>one????????????????????????????????
>>
>> HEY PM!!! Wake up!!! Smell some coffee or something!! Read the very
>> words you pasted in here. Without "reading between the lines" or
>> inventing. It has absolutely nothing, zero, zip, nada to do with
>> anyone "sending the wrong one." Try to get yourself into an orbit
>> reasonably close to Earth, and stop relating totally UNRELATED posts
>> to this simple combination of a request (which you asked for), your
>> reply, and his reply.
>>
>> He requested "3 boys in a bed."
>>
>> You said:
>>
>> :>>> Hi sorry I dumped this as the quality was so bad it was not worth
>> :>>> considering. Sorry.
>>
>> Saying that at one time you had the vid, but by your standards it
>> wasn't worth keeping. Read again your own words: "the quality was so
>> bad it was not worth considering."
>>
>> He replied:
>>
>> :>>It is a pity that their quality was bad... Maybe someone else has them ?
>>
>> Saying that he thought it was a shame that *you* thought it was so bad
>> you didn't keep it. And adding the simple hope that someone else might
>> have it and post it.
>>
>> Just exactly WHERE, in this simple exchange, did you go off into your
>> suborbital flap about pjk this versus pjk that and "sending the wrong
>> one" and the fact that none of the vids you have are "of tv quality"
>> so therefore you'll never post again??????????
>>
>> It was a simple request, followed by your comment, followed by his
>> reply. End of discussion. It was about "3 boys in a bed." It wasn't
>> about pjk anything, nor was it about "tv quality."
>>
>> There was an entirely SEPARATE discussion regarding a request for
>> pjkj9, and the pjk009 you posted, and the fact that what you posted
>> wasn't what someone was looking for. That was all there was to it.
>> There was no mention of "tv quality." It simply wasn't the vid he was
>> looking for. It had nada, nothing, zero, zip, to do with *this*
>> discussion.
>>
>> How you've gotten yourself off into this single ended war is totally
>> beyond me or anyone else who's been following this. All I can guess is
>> that it's some really bad brand of beer, and WAY too many pints of it.
>>
>> Chill, PM. Read the threads. Separate discussion A from discussion B.
>> If you still can't figure it out, then shut off the damn computer and
>> go to the beach.
>>
>> At this point your reactions have become plumb damn irritating. Put a
>> lid on it. Any lid. Even a double layer of Saran Wrap, if all else
>> fails.
>>
>> Yeeeeeesh! I hope I'm not like this 50 years from now.........
>
>You will be worse! I can tell. (big knowing grin here)
>Sigh, I've seen it happen all to often
>Remember when aDom came back, before he was made not there?
>See what you have to look forward to? Enjoy what you have while you
>still can. Maybe some more wrestling... :-)
>
>Y Not
>
>
>> KH NP-b54
>>
>> "My software never has bugs.
>> It just develops random features."
|
|