Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: kidhacker@nym.alias.net (:KidHacker NP-b54)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.poly
Subject: Re: moviefan you forgot this one
Date: 14 Jul 2003 20:12:14 -0500
Organization: Not in this lifetime
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <3f174429.17869480.qmail@nym.alias.net>
References: <m1tpgvcd6cl16solj4jhtdk8kpkqcannsn@4ax.com> <Xns93B4EFBCD513Amoviefan@216.40.28.72> <rvvsgvskv30fveuitgo1m48djku21kal40@4ax.com> <Xns93B57EA8AC401moviefan@216.40.28.72> <vf36hv035u3r9d08bnhhrceqcjd61k4jrl@4ax.com>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
X-WARNING-!!: Not to be taken internally unless swallowed whole
X-Yes-Archive: NOT!
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.poly:80
On 14 Jul 2003 16:17:14 -0500, powdermonkey <> wrote:
:>REMEMBER SENDING THIS when you said that the one I sent was the wrong
:>one????????????????????????????????
HEY PM!!! Wake up!!! Smell some coffee or something!! Read the very
words you pasted in here. Without "reading between the lines" or
inventing. It has absolutely nothing, zero, zip, nada to do with
anyone "sending the wrong one." Try to get yourself into an orbit
reasonably close to Earth, and stop relating totally UNRELATED posts
to this simple combination of a request (which you asked for), your
reply, and his reply.
He requested "3 boys in a bed."
You said:
:>>> Hi sorry I dumped this as the quality was so bad it was not worth
:>>> considering. Sorry.
Saying that at one time you had the vid, but by your standards it
wasn't worth keeping. Read again your own words: "the quality was so
bad it was not worth considering."
He replied:
:>>It is a pity that their quality was bad... Maybe someone else has them ?
Saying that he thought it was a shame that *you* thought it was so bad
you didn't keep it. And adding the simple hope that someone else might
have it and post it.
Just exactly WHERE, in this simple exchange, did you go off into your
suborbital flap about pjk this versus pjk that and "sending the wrong
one" and the fact that none of the vids you have are "of tv quality"
so therefore you'll never post again??????????
It was a simple request, followed by your comment, followed by his
reply. End of discussion. It was about "3 boys in a bed." It wasn't
about pjk anything, nor was it about "tv quality."
There was an entirely SEPARATE discussion regarding a request for
pjkj9, and the pjk009 you posted, and the fact that what you posted
wasn't what someone was looking for. That was all there was to it.
There was no mention of "tv quality." It simply wasn't the vid he was
looking for. It had nada, nothing, zero, zip, to do with *this*
discussion.
How you've gotten yourself off into this single ended war is totally
beyond me or anyone else who's been following this. All I can guess is
that it's some really bad brand of beer, and WAY too many pints of it.
Chill, PM. Read the threads. Separate discussion A from discussion B.
If you still can't figure it out, then shut off the damn computer and
go to the beach.
At this point your reactions have become plumb damn irritating. Put a
lid on it. Any lid. Even a double layer of Saran Wrap, if all else
fails.
Yeeeeeesh! I hope I'm not like this 50 years from now.........
KH NP-b54
"My software never has bugs.
It just develops random features."
|
|