Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Bagoas <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.poly
Subject: Re: Any Requests?
Date: 12 Jul 2003 22:02:13 -0500
Organization: http://www.newscene.com
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <tbf1hv857q8hicvrqnrq1nhko8v43p9fck@4ax.com>
References: <m1tpgvcd6cl16solj4jhtdk8kpkqcannsn@4ax.com> <59mPa.30561$H17.9248@sccrnsc02> <v10tgv43d4ehj56l5s29ddq740r4s35jpl@4ax.com> <nb9tgvcisu7kjc0ur4jmhi0tm43hmilt32@4ax.com> <q5otgvst3qsj85pv4h4rb2g2bb3tlafpll@4ax.com> <sfcugv4qnjbc9sqrr9rg667nj86ihh0jd6@4ax.com> <Xns93B692782A83ENicolas@140.99.99.130> <120720031522043546%Y-Not@host.com>
Reply-To: Bagoas
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.poly:70
While I understand your point, why would anyone naturally assume that
some boys wouldn't enjoy sex with an attractive man? Not only that,
but isn't it hypocritical for "most boylovers" to post and download
films that depict sex between two boys when everyone knows that men
orchestrate and film the action? Can anyone really believe that these
same boys don't also have sex with the man taking the film? I would
say any material that depicts boys in a sexualized manner is
questionable and therefore the logic behind posting b/b and not m/b is
inherently flawed.
Personally, I don't see any harm in posting these "questionable
vids"as long as there is mutual enjoyment. But that is just my
opinion and you know what they say about those...
Bagoas
>In article <Xns93B692782A83ENicolas@140.99.99.130>, Nicolas
><Nicolas@tiscali.com> wrote:
>
>> Unforgiven <u@u.com> wrote in news:sfcugv4qnjbc9sqrr9rg667nj86ihh0jd6@
>> 4ax.com:
>>
>> > It is not a matter of legality as much as morality.
>> > In a b/b vid you know the boys are having fun.
>> > In a m/b vid it is always questionable.
>> > Most boy lovers won't post questionable material.
>> > Take Care:-))
>> > U
>>
>>
>> that avoids even raising questions about oneself
>>
>> ;-)
>
>
>The raising of what?
>Would you be a little more clear on the point that you're trying to
>make?
>
>
>Y Not
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
|