In article <s0a8jv8k118il5743gt0n4rt6j4mbekcuf@4ax.com>, Secret
Squirrel <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On 7 Aug 2003 09:25:03 -0500, "powdermonkey" <me@here.com> wrote:
>
> >We were talking about ONE PARTICULAR FILM ONLY, with a boy of about three, a
> >BABY, put one of your young relatives in that babies place and tell me you
> >think its great. If you dont like what I post then dont look at it, but I
> >will not, nor will any of my fellow posters, of which you two are not, post
> >babies in any shape or form. If you dont post then maybe you should keep
> >your opinions to yourself. What posters discuss between them is for them and
> >not the leeches who hang about in the background. that is why I post in one
> >group only and if you dont have it hard shit, I cant say I give a damn. If
> >you do and dont like my posts thats your privilege, but before criticising
> >put up a post of your own to give yourself some credence.
>
>
> First of all, anything you post openly to this newsgroup is fair game
> for comment. Newsgroups are public domains.
>
> If you are afraid of flames, then perhaps you should send your
> comments to "your fellow posters" only via email?
>
> As far as me being a "leech," how do you know what I have posted or do
> post? Just because I am not posting right now, or in this particular
> group, does not a leech make. I've been around for a long, long time
> under many names and I subscribe to many groups. Trust me when I tell
> you that I have earned the right to post my opinions, but even if I
> had never posted a thing, this is still a public newsgroup and I
> (along with everyone else with access) have the right to comment on
> posts.
>
>
> As to posting content, there are many things I find objectionable in
> these groups (and the 23 other active groups that I'm aware of). I
> never said I disagreed with you about disliking a particular vid or
> subject, I just stated that it was hypocritical for anyone that lurks,
> or posts in these newsgroups to ever condemn someone for their posts.
> Personally, I wouldn't want to see any of my relatives posted in
> anything on topic in this group.
>
> Why should we allow all posts that are remotely on contact? Because
> you don't have to download it if you don't like it. When it comes to
> posts with attachments, I make it a policy not to comment one way or
> the other about the posts for reasons I stated earlier. I believe
> that the posts to this group (and all the others) should flow freely
> without criticism.
>
> Personally, I think we should avoid doing what we're doing right now.
> There are other groups that are for text messages only where we could
> debate the merits of particular posts. Lets let posters post what
> they may and lurkers download what they wish. Remember, this group is
> for outcasts. Bringing more prejudice into the group only makes it
> worse. I am not here to make anyone angry or cause more hate, I only
> wanted to make a point.
>
> SS
I think that maybe there might be possibly slightly more than one point
here. But well said.
Y Not
|
|