AA <AA@DoubleA.com> wrote in
news:0duxd.1465$AN3.739@fe13.usenetserver.com:
> rich <noyb@some.com> wrote in news:Xns95C37022B289142023112va@
> 140.99.99.130:
>
>> You know who you are, you owe me and another gentleman an apology.
>> If you are clergy, and I don't believe that, clergy doesn't nor
>> wouldn't speak or act as you have. You are as sick as Adolf was.
>> Fortunately, you're not in the same authority position as he was.
>> I lived thro some of Adolf, saw the results of him and lost some
>> family to his war. The supreme sacrifice, made by many, so you
>> can spout off your BS, tear down the country & destroy all that
>> is good. Well, understand this: I will NEVER bow to the likes
>> of you...NEVER!!! God will be in my house, Christ in my Christmas,
>> and "In God We Trust" my motto. If you don't like the USA, get
>> the hell out..NOW! The sooner the better. BTW, I voted for
>> George W. Bush and am proud of it, Kerry is not my choice, now
>> or ever. You see, I'm not afraid to say what I stand up for.
>> I'd do it in public, in fact I already have, If you disagree,
>> ok, that's your business. It's your way of attacking others that
>> I find sick & disgusting..spreading lies. Remember, NEVER is a
>> long time, a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time.
>>
>> Merry Christmas
>
>
> Hi Rich,
>
> As Unforgiven was saying, we'll never get an apology. Y-Not's style
> is to attack people, and lecture everyone on everything. Noone is
> immune to his attacks, not even the good people in our groups. Most
> of the things he lectures on, are things he clearly knows little or
> nothing about. Such as religion, psychology, or even the reason why
> Target banned the Salvation Army from its stores.
Do you actually KNOW why Target banned the SA? Were you in the boardroom
when and where the decision was made? Was Mr. Not? I doubt either of you
KNOW the real reason the SA was banned from Target. You both are
specualating based on what you heard, from one source or another. I've
heard something entirely different from what either of you or Mr. Not said,
but I'm not going to presume that all of my information is correct all of
the time.
>It's really quite
> amusing to see him go on and on making a fool out of himself,
> everywhere he posts. And isn't it interesting how Y-Not expresses
> more opinions, on more subjects, than all other people in our groups
> combined. Just as foolish looking are his little wind-up dolls who
> follow him around from group to group, and thread to thread, agreeing
> with every bit of his nonsense. Y-Not is an intolerant, liberal
> flake, and not surprisingly a coward too. Victim, who refered to me
> earlier in this thread as Adolf (obviously Hitler), was either Y-Not
> himself, or one of his wind-up dolls, of which Duey is one of. (Take
> your pick of about 3 people I think it could be. My first guess would
> be a name that starts with a 'g' though). The reason for that post
> was nothing more than a cowardly excuse for Y-Not to attack my post,
> and me personally.
I realize you have difficulty with seeing the truth, but the fact is that
Mr. Not had absolutely nothing to do with the reason I posted to you. Mr.
Not made it quite clear that he disapproved of my post, in case you didn't
notice. Mr. Not is much different than me in that he more than likely
believes that you have some sort of redeeming value. I, on the other hand,
have all but ruled out any possibility that you could offer the world
anything other than filth and hate. Over the years you have shown me you
are nasty and spiteful.
>It wasn't enough that Y-Not drove me away from
> another group recently, with an unprovoked attack there. He's a
> troublemaker who obviously has no limits. He's thoroughly insulted
> you, and now Unforgiven in this same thread. But hey, he attacks
> KidHacker every chance he gets too, as well as other highly thought of
> regulars in our groups. Another recent display of Y-Not's talents,
> was his attack on Mephistopheles in the Fort. Y-Not calls this his
> "work." What we have here, is obviously a guy who is housebound,
> possibly stuck in a wheel chair, and who sits in front of his computer
> 24/7. The time stamps on his posts suggests he gets little to no
> sleep, and perhaps this extremely unhealthy lifestyle of his has
> driven him insane over the years; assuming he wasn't already insane
> before he discovered usenet. (I probably shouldn't have said that,
> 'cause now he'll answer back and suggest that he actually invented
> usenet. Or was it the Internet he invented? It's so hard to keep up
> with all his inventions, just as it is keeping up with all the
> professional careers he's listed on his public resume, which he's
> forever adding to). One thing I'm certain of though, is that the
> closest Y-Not has come to a pyschologist, is as a patient in a
> pychologist's office, or possibly an institution of some sort. We all
> know that the definition of a Troll is one who causes disruption, by
> attacking posters and group regulars, and generally distracting the
> group from its normal business. Does that, or does that not sound
> like Y-Not? (Hey Y-Not: if the shoe fits, wear it).
>
> Duey, who doesn't seem to know how to do anything but follow Y-Not
> around and insult people, can't be taken seriously either. In a
> cowardly act, he commented on this thread in another group, in a
> totally unrelated thread. This was after my first post in this
> thread. There, Duey referred to the "religious poster' as being
> "closed minded." I assume the gutless wonder was talking about me.
> He ended that post with an atheistic quote, which obviously defines
> his own way of thinking. But can you imagine a more close-minded
> person than an atheist, who essentially believes that there is nothing
> more to this world than what he see with his own eyes, or that he is
> capable of comprehending with his own limited mind? Now if THAT isn't
> amusing, I don't know what is.
Can YOU imagine a more close minded person than one that would define
another based on one little sentence in one post, which may actually have
nothing to do with this thread? Oh wait. That's right. You imagine it
anyway you want it to be.
>
> Y-Not is wrong. 85% of Americans say that he is.
Actually, you are wrong again. You are misintrepreting your bogus facts to
justify your opinions. That 85% of Americans (may) believe in Christ does
NOT mean 85% believe Christ should be rammed down everyone else's throat,
like you want to do.
>He and Duey ought
> to move to Afghanistan. Maybe they'd be a lot more comfortable living
> there. Oh wait. That's right. I almost forgot, our conservative
> American government liberated that country, and it's no longer a
> paradise for the evil terrorists that it once was.
No, it's just a paradise for the Heroin trade. That said, I agree with
what the USA did there, even though the consequence is less than ideal.
>Well, as
> Unforgiven was saying, they could always move to Iraq. Oh, but that
> won't work either. The Bush Administration removed the brutal regime
> there too, and soon Iraq will be completely liberated. Gee, we're
> running out of places they could move to, where they might develop a
> real appreciation for this country after a short stay. But then, it
> might just be with their particular natures, that they could never
> love, respect, or appreciate this country, or the people who love,
> respect and appreciate this country. Some people are just born
> miserable. They won't be happy or satisfied, no matter how much they
> have, and no matter how fortunate they are.
Maybe you and Rich should move to Iran, since you obviously want to be
controlled by a fundamentalist theocracy. Then *YOU* might see what you
are trying to create in the US. Oh wait. I forgot. You only see what you
want to see.
>
> On the other hand, Rich, you are a good man. You're a good friend,
> and a good American. God bless you. You have a good heart........
......You, Rich, agree with AA, so you are good. People who don't agree
with AA are bad people. AA=good, All other opinions=bad.
> There
> are none so blind as those who will not see. Y-Not is not capable of
> seeing your heart, Rich, any more than he is capable of seeing the
> disruption, the chaos, and even the damage he causes in these groups.
> Maybe we should all be praying for his recovery from whatever it is
> that is tormenting him so. Maybe if he finds some blessed relief,
> he'll have a change of heart and stop tormenting all the rest of us.
> But Y-Not will still have to understand in the meantime that we're all
> just mortal humans, and limited in our supply of patience and
> tolerance. When he pisses us off, he'll just have to accept our
> justifiable anger and deal with it.
>
> AA
Despite everything I've said to you, I tend to agree with the underlying
premise that political correctness goes to far sometimes, and that people
need to lighten up a bit.
Out of spite and my seemingly ever growing disliking of you, I called you
Adolf just to cause trouble and piss you off, and I should not have done
that. I should have torn your post apart for the pack of lies and crap
that it was, but to be honest, you really aren't worth my precious time.
That said, I apologize for resorting to such a low and pathetic tactic.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 |
|