Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: PM@cannon.bang
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pegas
Subject: Re: Repost and repost and more repost
Date: 9 Jun 2005 01:19:04 -0500
Organization: Newscene Usenet News Service, http://www.newscene.com/
Lines: 143
Message-ID: <rcnfa19ndtfjllco1l1odeepel9nl9duvc@4ax.com>
References: <62pea1hsts4rbplfbl6bk5gjiopmm1smag@4ax.com> <fbrea19kadg7ni83dh5nc64t5vd06u31g9@4ax.com> <022fa197pfm65th9tm50tlkrd41df7u0mm@4ax.com> <fvkfa19gh91cqa7qum57gqs9869u26eg8s@4ax.com> <pan.2005.06.09.06.08.16.298307@hotmail.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.pegas:1542
I dont even need a secondary server, Newscene is all I need, combined
with the paid version of Agent. I am somewhat surprised that nobody
has yet told me they cant use the pars. I still use FSRaid, and did
give them the addy for it. 10% is adequate. I am reposting most of
apoapos vids starting next week for TT, who is at the moment in
hospital. He has given many people much pleasure with his posts and as
a close friend of mine I feel he is entitled to all he missed, or at
least those that are no longer on his server after any time limit they
may impose. I do think many have their servers or readers wrongly
configured, but there is a help file on them all, a simple matter to
read it. PM. NP.f35.
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:08:21 +0200, Chickenhawk
<s_bleisch@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Right on PM.
>I use newshosting.com as primary and easynews as secondary source and the
>3rd batch I posted a little bit ago shows up in full on all their servers.
>I'm sure there are a few other inexpensive servers out there also showing
>all parts. It can always happen that one server misses a part or two,
>that's where the PAR or PAR2 files come in handy.
>Rule of thumb: 1 PAR or PAR2 for every 10 original files should be enough
>to download and reconstruct the file. If anyone's server is continually
>missing more than 10% of all files posted, that server is crap or their
>newsreader wrongly configured and they should consider either getting help
>to set up their newsreader or changing servers.
>
>Chickenhawk
>
>Am Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:46:02 -0500 schrieb PM:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Well unfortunately if you use auto download then you take the chance
>> of wasting dl time/quantity. . Why not set your comp to download only
>> the files you need by rubber banding them, in that way you get only
>> the files you want and nothing you dont, and no further waste, with
>> lots of dl left for other things. In the meantime, maybe you would
>> like to join the losing battle with the tightwads who wont pay a few $
>> for a decent server to eliminate this. You will notice that many of
>> the posters now have stopped doing reposts, myself included. Once a
>> post is finished, then thats it. When I start reposting some of them
>> yet again, they are for a very deserving friend who has, I guarantee,
>> given you and the rest lots of plesure with his very many posts, he
>> deserves this help, and will get it. This continuous missing of many
>> files on some servers is so easily rectifiable. If a post is not got
>> the first time that not our problem. We know the post is full. We
>> check the servers and we see every file there. Its not the servers,
>> its the people who use servers that are the waste of time. I do
>> notice that recently there has been less requests for reposts. Why,
>> well maybe they have decided to spend a bit less on other things and
>> got a new server. Secondly they may now have looked at their server
>> and realised it was set wrong, often a common mistake, the answer is
>> there, they only need to tick the right boxes. Thirdly, they realise
>> that at last they have pissed the posters off, and spoiled it for
>> everyone, or fourthly, decided that the posters were right to get
>> angry about it and given up trying to download. Whatever the answer
>> is, THE FILES ARE ALL THERE ON ALL THE GOOD SERVERS, and will remain
>> so for a minimum of 10 days, sometimes more, on all the servers we
>> keep recommending. PM. NP.f35.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:19:56 -0700, Lee <Lee@mac.hush.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 8 Jun 2005 17:24:03 -0500, PM@cannon.bang wrote:
>>>
>>>>Its quite simple, there are many on here who use crap servers, and the
>>>>posters, being decent people, keep posting to give everyone the
>>>>chance, in different groups. Even then many miss them.
>>>
>>>Boy there server are so crapy they need a full repost in the last
>>>month there have been 4 vids with 3 full repost almost boy to have
>>>such a crapy server why even bother then
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I shall be
>>>>reposting them all next week or so in another group, for a special
>>>>friend, someone you know well as a poster, who is in hospital at the
>>>>moment and cant get them. If you have them, why begrudge others!!!! I
>>>>get the idea that as long as you get them then nobody else should have
>>>>the chance.
>>>
>>>being a past poster I think its real cool for the poster to be posting
>>>and have no complaint about the posting its only the re re re
>>>postingas I work and put my downloading on auto. and when I pay for a
>>>good server I hate paying for a second download.
>>>
>>>
>>> maybe in the meantime YOU can do like Apoapo and post new
>>>>things for people. Failing that, just switch your computer off, and
>>>>leave others alone.
>>>
>>>
>>>Oh thats real nice of you I don't post any more do to others
>>>
>>>
>>> I will say that when I repost for OUR friend next
>>>>week I will not post so much as one repost after the initial total
>>>>post, as he never needs reposts, why?? he got a decent server. Nor
>>>>will I in any future posts make so much as one repost after the
>>>>initial post. If people cant use pars thats their problem not the
>>>>posters. The time has come for posters to make decisions on posting,
>>>>and not be at the behest of lurkers. PM. NP.f35.
>>>
>>>
>>>Now that make since Pars with a fair server and a back up second
>>>server there would be no need for repost most of the time
>>>
>>>
>>>Iam not here to complain to the current posters. I want to thank them
>>>for there effort they have put in for everyone to enjoy. But I am
>>>complainting about the RE RE RE RE POST.
>>>>Lee (" _")
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:40:00 -0700, Lee <Lee@mac.hush.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>wha ist up with the repost of freinds of poland part 3 and NF-vid 8
>>>>>Ning and Dong. There have been more repost in the last month than ever
>>>>>before I mean full repost and small repost, there becoming a real pain
>>>>>in the you know what. How about writing repost of repost.
>>>>>
>>>>>Lee (" _")
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>><When your heart is weighed against the feather, may the feather be the heavier.>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <When your heart is weighed against the feather, may the feather be the heavier.>
<When your heart is weighed against the feather, may the feather be the heavier.>
|
|