In article <409d6f85$1_9@127.0.0.1>, I_object <X@126.0.0.1:4299> wrote:
> "::FriendLee::" <+-Friend@Lee.com> wrote:
> >In article <409cb5d0$1_5@127.0.0.1>, I_object <X@126.0.0.1:4299> wrote:
> >
> >> "::FriendLee::" <+-Friend@Lee.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 7 May 2004 09:18:54 -0500, while searchin, lurkin, and jerkin,
> >> >> gollum crawled out of his hole and spewed the following crap:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Since you couldn't keep your mouth shut I decided to become your
> >> >> >friend!
> >> >> >I won't leave the group alone and I won't leave you alone either.
> >> >> >And that's your own fault!
> >> >>
> >> >> OK, but you'll be sorry like my other friend was. :)
> >> >>
> >> >> Now that I have previewed the movie that you object to, I have to
> >> >> wonder if your objections have been misplaced. I've seen more than a
> >> >> few of these movies, and in a lot of them the boys don't seem
> >> >> overjoyed to be there. However, in avseq1, the boys seem genuinely
> >> >> happy, willing participants.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >In Japanese culture, and to a lesser extent, other Oriental cultures,
> >> >it's traditional in a sexual situation that one participant do the
> >> >"work", and the other participant remain passive to what is happening,
> >> >even uninterested, especially when the participants are of unequal
> >> >social status. They are *very* sensitive to what Westerners would call
> >> >the social "pecking order".
> >> >This may seem strange to many people, but we are *all* strange to
> >> >strangers.
> >>
> >> All very true indeed.
> >> But it still makes no good reason for shoving a big vibrator up the ass of
> >> a
> >> little Oriental boy. Neither is it a good excuse to enjoy a vid that shows
> >> such
> >> happening.
> >
> >Do you object to what other people "enjoy"? No person chooses what he
>
> Of course at times I object to what others enjoy. Like you do too! Remember
> Homeanon?
I have not posted anything at all about what others enjoy, for or
against. I did not post in the newsgroup he posted in, nor have I ever
posted a comment about him.
> >will enjoy or despise. This is entirely involuntary. There can be no
> >excuse for what isn't a choice, as it isn't applicable. It would be a
> >*very* good idea for you to avoid expressing this kind of reasoning.
> >There is a whole world of people who think the same way about *your*
> >feelings for the movies you like. You would validate THEM?
> >
> >> >Is there a misunderstanding here?
> >> >If you two are going to fight, maybe you could pick a more worthwhile
> >> >reason?
> >>
> >> Whooo, but I think this is a worthwhile reason to fight!
> >
> >No it isn't. Your fight can change nothing, therefore it *is*
> >worthless. And you even tipped the balance against you that might have
> >been in your favor, by your use of abusive language, and by resorting
> >to personal attacks.
> >So, not only is your fight worthless, you are edging yourself into
> >becoming a part of that evaluation.
> >
> >> Because, apart from 'children being forced', there's also this:
> >>
> >> This group was only recently started as a place *to post high quality
> >> Japanese
> >> boy vids*.
> >> By posing Avseq1 here (which is non-Japanese filth) any good reason for
> >> this
> >> group to excist has ceased.
> >> For gods sake, there are at least six other active groups where
> >> *little-boys-porn* is being posted!
> >>
> >> >It's my understanding that you both have the same feelings against
> >> >children being forced. You are more alike than you are different. You
> >> >can build on that. If you feel like it.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >FriendLee
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "We are them. They are us.
> >> > Together all, we are the world."
> >
> >
> >Your evaluation of what this newsgroup is for, is one-sided and
> >inaccurate. That you object to the posting of one movie, does *not*
> >constitute a reason for this group to cease to exist.
> >It was peaceful. Even the impersonations weren't unpleasant.
> >The only unpleasantness here, is you. Is that what you want?
> >
> >I haven't seen any of the movies here in this newsgroup, and I don't
> >intend to. If I did, I would probably agree with you about them. But I
> >do *not* agree with you attacking posters who post what is requested,
>
> And when did I attack the poster? I never adressed or named him!
Anyone who posts, is a poster. This is not restricted to just posting
movies. Gollum is a poster. So am I. So are you. If you see us in the
newsgroups, it's because we posted. Therefore we are posters.
> >especially because you can't win. People will request things you don't
> >like, and people will post them. You can't change it. Not at all. You
>
> So I never tried to stop the posting. I voiced an opinion because the
> requester
> more or less asked for it.
He did ask. No one else asked for yours.
You didn't stop there. You posted an opinion, as is your right. So did
others, but you attacked *them* for their (asked for) opinions that
disagreed with yours. They didn't asked to be called names, and then be
followed to other threads, for you to continue your attack.
> >can't change what other people do in the newsgroups.
> >You only have control over what *you* do. Well, you will, when you
> >start exercising some. You can lead by example, and hope some will
> >emulate you, or you can show yourself as an example of someone who
> >should *not* be respected or emulated.
>
> I'm not like you. I don't want to lead or be respected.
No one is the same as anyone else.
I have no desire for either, also, and will probably never have to
worry about it. Posting for just week, isn't going to gain much.
> >Yes, you care about your feelings about this issue. Do others? Not
> >after you abuse them. You could possibly have been able to influence a
> >few people, just a little bit, in a very worthy cause, but you threw it
> >all away with your confrontational attitude and objectionable language.
> >You could have been a force for good. Now, you are just a proponent of
> >bad will. What a waste!
>
> Tuttuttuttut
> >
This is the real you. You don't actually care what you do, except to
cause dissension.
> >I'm only posting in this group, as a test, because someone (who may be
> >gone) didn't seem to have paid much attention to what happened here,
> >except when he was told about it. That's why I haven't mentioned his
> >name in any of my posts here, to avoid drawing his attention.
> >I probably won't be posting here again.
> >
> >
> >FriendLee
> >
> >
> > "We are them. They are us.
> > Together all, we are the world."
>
> Even tough I don't know what game you're playing right now, it seems to me
> you
> are losing it!
There is nothing to win or loose here. There is no game, except that
you treat other people as if they are worth no more then little game
pieces
> *I_object* will caese to excist soon. Both of us will use a different nic
> when
> we meet again.
> I hope you got better then!
>
I have no plans to change nics. Nor do I have any desire to meet you
again. You tried to figure out who I am, and got it wrong. When you
measure with a crooked ruler, you get crooked results. I know that the
nic you used here is not your only one, but I don't care to know your
other nics.
The person who have confused me with, was nice. Sickeningly, sweetly
nice. I'm not. He cared about everyone. I don't think most people are
worth it. He would try to "save" you. I don't care. I wouldn't mind at
all, if you went to stay in a very warm place. I would happily help
some others to join you there. where you all can have a devil of a time
together.
That I have an education, and that I can actually think, doesn't make
me HIM, or anyone else but me. He was accused of acting as if everyone
who disagreed with him was a Troll. Is that any different from what you
are doing?
Am I afraid of HIM posting against me? Not at all. I've studied him. I
know what he attacks. I'm not giving him anything he can use against
me. But he does know who I am, so I'm not going to oppose him directly.
He didn't respond to me directly in the other group, because I know how
to keep him off me.
FriendLee
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|