Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pegas
Organization: xo
Message-ID: <6rpp90t0dno5f7g202av466m8jpm8dn9pp@4ax.com>
References: <409b9ace$1_11@127.0.0.1> <lqvn901qfrf9k9og14fr6qf73k3otan82m@4ax.com> <070520042233131914%+-Friend@Lee.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 83
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 15:35:47 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.pegas:128
On 7 May 2004 21:36:08 -0500, while searchin, lurkin, and jerkin,
gollum crawled out of his hole and spewed the following crap:
>
>> On 7 May 2004 09:18:54 -0500, while searchin, lurkin, and jerkin,
>> gollum crawled out of his hole and spewed the following crap:
>>
>> >
>> >Since you couldn't keep your mouth shut I decided to become your friend!
>> >I won't leave the group alone and I won't leave you alone either.
>> >And that's your own fault!
>>
>> OK, but you'll be sorry like my other friend was. :)
>>
>> Now that I have previewed the movie that you object to, I have to
>> wonder if your objections have been misplaced. I've seen more than a
>> few of these movies, and in a lot of them the boys don't seem
>> overjoyed to be there. However, in avseq1, the boys seem genuinely
>> happy, willing participants.
>>
>
>
>In Japanese culture, and to a lesser extent, other Oriental cultures,
>it's traditional in a sexual situation that one participant do the
>"work", and the other participant remain passive to what is happening,
>even uninterested, especially when the participants are of unequal
>social status. They are *very* sensitive to what Westerners would call
>the social "pecking order".
>This may seem strange to many people, but we are *all* strange to
>strangers.
>
>Is there a misunderstanding here?
>If you two are going to fight, maybe you could pick a more worthwhile
>reason?
>It's my understanding that you both have the same feelings against
>children being forced. You are more alike than you are different. You
>can build on that. If you feel like it.
>
>
>FriendLee
>
>
> "We are them. They are us.
> Together all, we are the world."
Hi FriendLee:
I am not fighting. I simply object to one persons objections to this
film being posted here, as I would like the opportunity to see it and
object to the content, if I so choose, myself.
I think you are right that I_Object and I object to child abuse.
I think where we differ is that I object to poster and lurker abuse.
Several people (who probably haven't seen the film), have expressed a
desire to see the film posted against the objections of one person
(who has seen it). He called those supporting the posting "sick
son[s] of bitch[es]" for not being able to "see the difference with
other vids already posted here". In my case, I am a "sick son of a
bitch" because I can't see the difference between some videos that I
haven't seen.
I think the group would be much more open to I_Object's objections if
he would refrain from hurling names and allegations at people who want
what he already has, which is the opportunity to see the film and
judge for themselves if it is objectionable.
That said, thanks for your comments, FriendLee. If you are not who
you look like you are, you do a real good job of looking like him. :)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|