On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 05:06:01 GMT, TheGratefulDead
<thegratefuldead@your.house> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:11:36 GMT, TheGratefulDead
>><thegratefuldead@your.house> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 02:37:33 GMT, TheGratefulDead
>>>><thegratefuldead@your.house> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Try this. It's an .ogg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>It sounds good, but I see why there is a size difference.
>>>>>The MP3 was encoded at 320kbps, where the OGG was
>>>>>encoded at 119kbps during the conversion process.
>>>>
>>>>What?
>>>>Did you see two files?
>>>>I only see the second one, the MP3 version.
>>>>Eh?
>>>>
>>>Yep, I downed a .ogg and a .mp3. Do you want me to up the .ogg file?
>>
>>Nah, I upped the file in .ogg and MP3 but due to the low retention
>>factor for this non-binary group, one replaced the other on my server.
>> In any event, there is a good bit of difference, even at the
>>different bit rates, which I didn't notice.
>>
>That player I d/led is kind of a pain in the ass, but it
>does give good info on a playing file.
Yes, I like it for the .oggs, having a bit of trouble associating them
with it, but I'll get it to work sooner or later.
In alt.binaries.aubergine, today, I upped 19 ogg files (64.3 MB) and
it only took 68 minutes.
That's really good.
--
A dunce for all seasons.
Founder & President, *Dunce of the Month Club*
Coordinator, *Yaks for the Yakless, International*
Voted *Usenets Most Trusted Person In History*, 1956 -2004.
Quote: "I have never met a dunce I've liked!"
---------
The preceding post was scanned for signs of
FAILED
-----------------
broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written
|
|