>On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:11:36 GMT, TheGratefulDead
><thegratefuldead@your.house> wrote:
>
>>
>>>On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 02:37:33 GMT, TheGratefulDead
>>><thegratefuldead@your.house> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Try this. It's an .ogg.
>>>>>
>>>>It sounds good, but I see why there is a size difference.
>>>>The MP3 was encoded at 320kbps, where the OGG was
>>>>encoded at 119kbps during the conversion process.
>>>
>>>What?
>>>Did you see two files?
>>>I only see the second one, the MP3 version.
>>>Eh?
>>>
>>Yep, I downed a .ogg and a .mp3. Do you want me to up the .ogg file?
>
>Nah, I upped the file in .ogg and MP3 but due to the low retention
>factor for this non-binary group, one replaced the other on my server.
> In any event, there is a good bit of difference, even at the
>different bit rates, which I didn't notice.
>
That player I d/led is kind of a pain in the ass, but it
does give good info on a playing file.
|
|