On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:11:36 GMT, TheGratefulDead
<thegratefuldead@your.house> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 02:37:33 GMT, TheGratefulDead
>><thegratefuldead@your.house> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Try this. It's an .ogg.
>>>>
>>>It sounds good, but I see why there is a size difference.
>>>The MP3 was encoded at 320kbps, where the OGG was
>>>encoded at 119kbps during the conversion process.
>>
>>What?
>>Did you see two files?
>>I only see the second one, the MP3 version.
>>Eh?
>>
>Yep, I downed a .ogg and a .mp3. Do you want me to up the .ogg file?
Nah, I upped the file in .ogg and MP3 but due to the low retention
factor for this non-binary group, one replaced the other on my server.
In any event, there is a good bit of difference, even at the
different bit rates, which I didn't notice.
--
A dunce for all seasons.
Founder & President, *Dunce of the Month Club*
Coordinator, *Yaks for the Yakless, International*
Voted *Usenets Most Trusted Person In History*, 1956 -2004.
Quote: "I have never met a dunce I've liked!"
---------
The preceding post was scanned for signs of
FAILED
-----------------
broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written
|
|