<Tattooed@mailmasher.com> wrote:
and just had to say the following...
>his/her/its keyboard, and the results are as follows:
>$<Tattooed@mailmasher.com> wrote:
>$ and just had to say the following...
>$>his/her/its keyboard, and the results are as follows:
>$>$<Tattooed@mailmasher.com> wrote:
>$>$ and just had to say the following...
>$>$>his/her/its keyboard, and the results are as follows:
>$>$>$<Tattooed@mailmasher.com> wrote:
>$>$>$ and just had to say the following...
>$>$>$>his/her/its keyboard, and the results are as follows:
>$>$>$>$<Tattooed@mailmasher.com> wrote:
>$>$>$>$ and just had to say the following...
>on
>$>$>$>$>his/her/its keyboard, and the results are as follows:
>$>$>$>$>$Just WTF is that Amadeus fellow on about in hussy.
>$>$>$>$>$Eh?
>$>$>$>$>$TIA
>$>$>$>$>$
>$>$>$>$>>He is just trying to divert attention away from
>Grainfarmer/Woodstock.
>$>$>$>$>>He just trying to dredge up ancient history on me to achieve this. It
>$>is
>$>$>$>$>>my opinion that this Amadeus is really Kinda Dumb who always sucked
>$>$>$>$>>Woodstock's ass. Do you remember Kinda Dumb? I could be wrong, but,
>$>$>$>$>>I don't know who else it could be.
>$>$>$>$
>$>$>$>$I see. But why does he want to divert attention away from that
>$>$>$>$person?
>$>$>$>$It didn't take much thought to reach the conclusion that WS is GF, but
>$>$>$>$so what?
>$>$>$>$I just don't get it.
>$>$>$>
>$>$>$>>I don't either. I don't know what crawled up his ass.
>$>$>$>
>$>$>$>$Yeah, I remember the nic, Kinda Dumb, but can't remember much else
>$>$>$>$about him.
>$>$>$>$That usually means that I didn't have any run ins, good or bad, with
>$>$>$>$the nic.
>$>$>$>$
>$>$>$>$You suggest that I simply ignore him, so, unless he keeps yammering, I
>$>$>$>$will do so.
>$>$>$>$That's not my style, in instances like this, where someone is shooting
>$>$>$>$off their yap, claiming to know stuff.
>$>$>$>
>$>$>$>>He has Googled some ancient history on me from alt.activism.children.
>$>$>$>
>$>$>$>$They actually know something, I want to know what it is, and w/o a
>$>$>$>$bunch of cryptic nonsense involved.
>$>$>$>$
>$>$>$>$But, it's no skin off of my nose, bro, either way.
>$>$>$>$
>$>$>$>>Go ahead and play with him if you want to. Makes no difference to me.
>$>$>$
>$>$>$Sorry, just couldn't help myself.<s>
>$>$>
>$>$>>LOL....so I see. <g>
>$>$>
>$>$>$Who knows but something interesting might just surface.
>$>$>
>$>$>>Just old stuff..........with his spin on it of course. He probably still
>$>$>>doesn't think that I am me. If he's gonnna fuck with Phoenix, he
>$>$>>will be in for a great suprise, that is if Phoenix feels he is worth
>$>$>>his time, which I doubt.
>$>$>
>$>$>$Say, you aren't Groucho, are you?<BG>
>$>$>
>$>$>>Ummmmm, the last time I looked I wasn't. <BFG>
>$>$
>$>$Like a house of cards, in a gentle breeze, it all collapsed.
>$>$Dammit!
>$>$
>$>$I had but to mention KD, and poof!
>$>$
>$>$Oh well.
>$>$<sigh....>
>$>$
>$>>If that's the case, then it might not have been KD, unless he
>$>>has changed. He used to be very persistant, wouldn't let
>$>>anything drop. It's my bet that Woodstock asked him to cool it.
>$>>Did you notice that Grainfarmer/Woodstock magically disappeared?
>$>>He probably saw that KD was getting out of hand.
>$
>$Well, perhaps you have underestimated my powers of persuasion?
>$Plus, he was catching some small amounts of flack from a couple other
>$fellows, so who really knows?
>$
>$Few days back, I gave a gentle ping to GF, and never got an
>$acknowledgement.
>$And then, GF was gone.
>$I think I remember seeing a PGP between you two, but that's really
>$none of my business.
>
>>Nope, the PGP was between Amadeus and Grainfarmer/Woodstock.
>>I posted my key for Grainfarmer/Woodstock, but he didn't use it. He
>>coresponded to Amadeus instead. That's what prompted my "Fuck
>>you, Woodstock" post which started all of Amadeus' shit.
Oh. OK, my error.
I do tend to get confused, at times.
>$Now, having said all of that, and with complete candor, I have to say
>$the following:
>$
>$I got the inside dope about how it all happened, meaning the great
>$hoax, and, well, some things just didn't add up.
>
>>What didn't add up?
Really?
OK, from memory:
Even though you didn't have any regs e-mail addy's on your machine,
after you were gone, the BIL somehow got an e-mail to your younger
twin brother, confirming that you were hasta la bye bye.
How's that happen?
Plus, just how in the heck did the BIL get into your machine, even to
post in Usenet?
Supposedly, he slammed a post into a certain froup, claiming to be the
person appointed by you, to notify peeps when you croaked, and then it
all got fuzzy....
It just doesn't add up.
I was told that it was impossibly that anyone's e-mail addy was on
your machine, and therefore, the mail that your younger twin brother
got, was, to say the least, perplexing.
Look, let's just forget it. No big deal.
Fuck it, we are all cops, anyway, so who gives a damn?
>$Wild and I exchanged a few PGP's, wherein I expressed my concerns,
>$but, even though I still had doubts, I finally wrote it all off to a
>$"need to know" thingy, and let it drop.
>$
>$That, and that alone, is the reason why this fellow attracted my
>$attention, in the first place.
>$It appeared that he had some information, that would enlighten me,
>$about you, WS, and who knows what else, and that interested me,
>$completely.
>$
>$Remember, I am the one that his home storm-troopered, all around the
>$same time as you were dead, and others were getting busted, and so,
>$quite naturally, I was, and am still, all ears, to anything along
>$those lines.
>
>>I think you are wrong about that. I think that you were "storm-troopered"
>>before I was dead. My "death" took place about this time last year.
True, but who can say how long the seeds were in the ground?
>$FYI, I am, technically, already 3+ strikes, and am looking, should the
>$shit hit the fan, a very long jolt. I will not go quietly.
>$
>$Trust me, if I can ever find out, for real, just who was behind my
>$last visit from the LEA, I would find a way to hurt them, fatally, if
>$possible.
>
>>What makes you think anyone was behind it. I thought that it
>>happened because of your posting.
No! NO!! And yes.
For about 3 weeks, my system was w/o a firewall.
I knew this, but, didn't think it important, and after all, I'll fix
it tomorrow.
In the meantime, I was hacked.
Then, running a very technical "spoofing", including my static ID,
hundreds of hc kp pics began to appear in 4 different groups.
Not just silly TAG's, or LAG's, or LS type shit, but real honest to
christ hc pics.
All the old ones, like the Helen's, and the hel-anal's, and all of
that type.
Pics that I have seen, but didn't have.
I never knew it was happening, as I very rarely DL a binary from those
groups. Plus, the pics were upped under several different nics, so,
if I saw them, I wouldn't have recognized the nic.
The German LEA, some "operation kinder" something or other, picked up
the pics, and the headers, and passed the info on to the Counsel
General, who flipped them to the CIA, who, in turn, handed them off to
the F.B.I., who then gave the information to the Customs fellows, and
then the game was on.
Warrant after warrant was served, until finally, they hit pay dirt
with my telephone company.
Then to a federal judge, and then, into my home.
Guns, helicopters, loud yelling, etc., and all of it very irritating,
to a sensitive dunce, like myself.
8+ hours later, they have nothing.
They have done a very thorough, and professional search of my entire
premises, and all 4 of my boxes, and they have zippo.
Highly trained forensic techs shake their heads and say, "Nope. He's
got nothing. It's all clear."
The lead Fed, looking very upset, say's to me, "Look, this op has cost
over $100,000, and we've got nothing. I need to justify all of this,
especially the fact that I am not hauling you in, to my boss. So,
just how do *you* explain it? Help me out here, OK?"
I tell him to call my lawyer.
So, yes, the "trooping" was about postings, but not any postings that
I had made.
>$And I mean just that.
>$If it was Groucho himself, or Wild, or you, or FF, or WS/GF, or
>$whomever, I'd spare no expense, and I'd take no hostages.
>
>>You're barking up the wrong trees there, Bro.
Possibly, but I just wanted to state my position.
Frankly, at this point, I don't even trust myself.
>$But, this is Usenet, where it's all fun and games, isn't it.
>$
>>Yep, sometimes it is, sometimes it's not. It's just Usenet.
Yeah, just silly old harmless Usenet.
--
A dunce for all seasons.
Founder & President, *Dunce of the Month Club*
Coordinator, *Yaks for the Yakless, International*
Voted *Usenets Most Trusted Person In History*, 1956 - 2005.
Declared *The Hardest Working Dunce In All Of Usenet*, 1963 - 2005.
Quote: "I have never met a dunce I've liked!"
---------
The preceding post was scanned for signs of
FAILED
-----------------
broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|