>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:25:09 -0600, Curly Bill
><CurlyBill@Tombstone.town> wrote:
>
>>
>>>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:13:35 -0600, Curly Bill
>>><CurlyBill@Tombstone.town> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:10:30 -0600, Curly Bill
>>>>><CurlyBill@Tombstone.town> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:14:19 -0600, Curly Bill
>>>>>>><CurlyBill@Tombstone.town> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you still need some music, I am upping *Those Were The Days*,
>>>>>>>>>Cream's best, both studio & live, into alt.pub.
>>>>>>>>>4 CD's
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I won't be able to get them because Giganews doesn't
>>>>>>>>accept binaries in a non-binary group. Not much of a
>>>>>>>>Cream fan anyway. I need The Beatles with cover art
>>>>>>>>if you have any. Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I see. Well, I do have my own binary group, alt.binaries.fastman, but
>>>>>>>I seldom use it.
>>>>>>>I also post into Auber's binary group, alt.binaries.aubergine, as a
>>>>>>>favor to him, helping build retention and space for his group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now, *Beatles* I have, some of anyway, in both MP3, and DESS ( .ape
>>>>>>>extension), and even some cover art.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The MP3's are my own rips, but the DESS stuff I find at
>>>>>>>alt.binaries.beatles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Which do you prefer?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>The MP3s are my preference. Preferebly at 192, but any will
>>>>>>suffice. Thanks. BTW, I don't get either of those froups. How
>>>>>>about alt.binaries.checkmate.mp3? We can fuck with the Dutch
>>>>>>and Germans that are posting in that froup. <g>
>>>>>
>>>>>OK, I have subbed into that froup, and will try and make some fresh
>>>>>rips later on today. BTW, what did you mean by "...at 192"?
>>>>>Bitrate?
>>>>
>>>>Yes....bitrate. If you have them already ripped at another bitrate
>>>>that will be fine.
>>>
>>>Hmmmm.. OK, I'll do rip them at that speed, just for you, even though
>>>you recently tried to murder me, but that seems awfully low.
>>>Oh well.
>>>BTW, what else ya need, old chum?
>>>
>>>
>>>>>I too like MP3's, as they are quick & easy, *but*, the quality of the
>>>>>non lossless DESS files is by far th best I have ever heard.
>>>>>Damned .ape files are huge by comparison!
>>>
>>This is just my own opinion, but to me, any higher bitrate can't
>>really be heard. I don't hear any difference between 192 and 320,
>>except for a larger file. BTW, if I tried to murder you, I would
>>have succeeded. <g>I would really like to regain "Surrealistic
>>Pillow" by Jefferson Airplane. I think that we have different tastes
>>in music. Let me know again what you have. Thank you!
>
>Well, I suppose it all depends on your sound system.
>I have a way chic goochie type sound card, and some awesome Labtec
>speakers, and I most definitely *can* hear a distinct difference.
>I usually rip CD's at above 300, average, and that's why I was totally
>blown away with the DESS (.ape) format.
>Fuckers are consistently above 600 @ 44 Hz, and bro, that is humming
>along close to original quality.
>But, like I said, the damned files are up in the 12 - 20 MB's, and
>that is nothing to sneeze at.
Well, i'm just a poor boy on Social Security, so I can't afford
a high fallootin' sound system such as you have.
>OK, OK, stop yer crying.<s>
>In a few days, I will rip the JA's Surrealistic Pillow, just for you,
>promise.
>I was going to do it earlier, or later, last year, but, well, you
>change yer socks more often than I change my underwear, and so,,,,
Kewl, sounds good to me. Do you think I should go back to
my original nic.......again? <g>
>And no, I'll be god damned if I am going to catalog all 400+ CD's &
>bootlegs, that I have.
>It's pretty simple:
>You ask, if have, you get.
>You ask, I don't got, you don't get.
Ok, Ok.........Ya got any Dave Clark Five?
>I got some blues CD's that go back to the 1950's, a ton of Stones, and
>stuff all in between.
>Mostly I am stuck in the 1960's -1970's rock scene.
>My latest acquisition is the complete *Velvet Underground* series.
>Awesome, really fucking awesome.
To me, the 70s was a non-music decade, except for Jim Croce and
the Bee Gees. HeHe
>We are probably not all that different, except that you are taller,
>while I am better looking.
>
>BTW, you divorce that bitch yet?
>HTH
>
We Go to court March 4, 2004. I'm going to nail her ass to the wall.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|