On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:25:09 -0600, Curly Bill
<CurlyBill@Tombstone.town> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:13:35 -0600, Curly Bill
>><CurlyBill@Tombstone.town> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:10:30 -0600, Curly Bill
>>>><CurlyBill@Tombstone.town> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:14:19 -0600, Curly Bill
>>>>>><CurlyBill@Tombstone.town> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>If you still need some music, I am upping *Those Were The Days*,
>>>>>>>>Cream's best, both studio & live, into alt.pub.
>>>>>>>>4 CD's
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I won't be able to get them because Giganews doesn't
>>>>>>>accept binaries in a non-binary group. Not much of a
>>>>>>>Cream fan anyway. I need The Beatles with cover art
>>>>>>>if you have any. Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I see. Well, I do have my own binary group, alt.binaries.fastman, but
>>>>>>I seldom use it.
>>>>>>I also post into Auber's binary group, alt.binaries.aubergine, as a
>>>>>>favor to him, helping build retention and space for his group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now, *Beatles* I have, some of anyway, in both MP3, and DESS ( .ape
>>>>>>extension), and even some cover art.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The MP3's are my own rips, but the DESS stuff I find at
>>>>>>alt.binaries.beatles.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Which do you prefer?
>>>>>>
>>>>>The MP3s are my preference. Preferebly at 192, but any will
>>>>>suffice. Thanks. BTW, I don't get either of those froups. How
>>>>>about alt.binaries.checkmate.mp3? We can fuck with the Dutch
>>>>>and Germans that are posting in that froup. <g>
>>>>
>>>>OK, I have subbed into that froup, and will try and make some fresh
>>>>rips later on today. BTW, what did you mean by "...at 192"?
>>>>Bitrate?
>>>
>>>Yes....bitrate. If you have them already ripped at another bitrate
>>>that will be fine.
>>
>>Hmmmm.. OK, I'll do rip them at that speed, just for you, even though
>>you recently tried to murder me, but that seems awfully low.
>>Oh well.
>>BTW, what else ya need, old chum?
>>
>>
>>>>I too like MP3's, as they are quick & easy, *but*, the quality of the
>>>>non lossless DESS files is by far th best I have ever heard.
>>>>Damned .ape files are huge by comparison!
>>
>This is just my own opinion, but to me, any higher bitrate can't
>really be heard. I don't hear any difference between 192 and 320,
>except for a larger file. BTW, if I tried to murder you, I would
>have succeeded. <g>I would really like to regain "Surrealistic
>Pillow" by Jefferson Airplane. I think that we have different tastes
>in music. Let me know again what you have. Thank you!
Well, I suppose it all depends on your sound system.
I have a way chic goochie type sound card, and some awesome Labtec
speakers, and I most definitely *can* hear a distinct difference.
I usually rip CD's at above 300, average, and that's why I was totally
blown away with the DESS (.ape) format.
Fuckers are consistently above 600 @ 44 Hz, and bro, that is humming
along close to original quality.
But, like I said, the damned files are up in the 12 - 20 MB's, and
that is nothing to sneeze at.
OK, OK, stop yer crying.<s>
In a few days, I will rip the JA's Surrealistic Pillow, just for you,
promise.
I was going to do it earlier, or later, last year, but, well, you
change yer socks more often than I change my underwear, and so,,,,
And no, I'll be god damned if I am going to catalog all 400+ CD's &
bootlegs, that I have.
It's pretty simple:
You ask, if have, you get.
You ask, I don't got, you don't get.
I got some blues CD's that go back to the 1950's, a ton of Stones, and
stuff all in between.
Mostly I am stuck in the 1960's -1970's rock scene.
My latest acquisition is the complete *Velvet Underground* series.
Awesome, really fucking awesome.
We are probably not all that different, except that you are taller,
while I am better looking.
BTW, you divorce that bitch yet?
HTH
--
A dunce for all seasons.
Founder & President, *Dunce of the Month Club*
Coordinator, *Yaks for the Yakless, International*
Voted *Usenets Most Trusted Person In History*, 1956 - 2004.
Declared *The Hardest Working Dunce In All Of Usenet*, 1963 - 2004.
Quote: "I have never met a dunce I've liked!"
---------
The preceding post was scanned for signs of
FAILED
-----------------
broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|