On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:16:41 -0600, Frank McCoy <mccoyf@millcomm.com>
wrote:
<snip>
>Most of that stuff is built to respawn itself if you try to delete it.
So I found out.
>That makes the proper removal of some of that stuff rather hairy.
>I know ... It took me almost two days to get rid of all the stuff on the kid's
>computer, so it *stayed* removed. That wasn't the OS, but the kid loading
>zillions of games on the system and accepting everything from each website.
>Spybot Search-and-destroy is kind of nice; not to mention Bazooka.
>Each one finds some stuff the other doesn't.
AdAware, also.
>
>Hell, I got ONE piece of ad-ware on my own computer the other day.
>How, I'm not sure. Probably some malicious website.
>
>>IMO, windows peaked somewhere around 98SE or W2K, and has been going
>>downhill since.
>
>98SE.
The only problem with 98SE, is that it can't mirror the hard drive,
while W2K (server) can. Also, if you need REAL user level security,
W2K would be better.
--
ArarghMail511 at [drop the 'http://www.' from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html
To reply by email, remove the garbage from the reply address.
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
60 | 61 | 62 |
|