In alt.fan.frank.mccoy Öldman© <b@ld.is.best> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:44:09 -0500,Frank McCoy's cat ran across
>the 'puter keyboard and out came...
>} In alt.fan.frank.mccoy �ldman© <b@ld.is.best> wrote:
>}
>} >Are you familiar with the term "moving window averaging"?
>} >
>} Quite familiar; having done similar things named "impossible" on the
>} old PTS with just one counter that worked somewhat like you described.
>} Of course, Windows complicated things a bit by being asynchronous; and
>} you having several free-running counters (as I see it).
>}
>
><snip>
>
>To avoid misunderstanding - the program is not running in a windoze environment.
>
>Re: specs supplied for CPU
>
Oh ... Not DOS, either, I gather?.
From your wording, I figure somebody wrote a 'C' compiler for the
board itself; or used a standard compiler to run an 8086-type clone
(or upward-compatible) on the same board, with defines for the I/O?
Then will have to use available on-board timers, if that's the case.
Would need specs on timers on the board, I guess. Somehow I got the
impression that the "standard" PC clock of 14.7 mhz was available.
I'll have to look through the defines files I guess, and see what's
there to play with.
>If you like I can give you the C Tools so you can play with the compiler.
>
>Don't try to run the .cmd file output, windoze most likely will become
>really upset with you and turn your PC into a paper wight.
>
Not likely. Would most likely just not run and hang, waiting for
something to happen that never would.
>Check the froup where I did the "test" post. I am unable to post even
>attachments to this froup.
I got it.
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|