In alt.fan.frank.mccoy Tim Merrigan <tppm@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Frank McCoy wrote:
>> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy Laurence Taylor <see-headers@iapetus.plus.com>
>> wrote:
>
>>>I still think that the correct action would be release, along with some
>>>form of SOTP course, or simply a good talking-to, to point out that
>>>just because it was OK for her, it doesn't follow for other people -
>>>with a heavy emphasis on the (legal and social) consequences of
>>>following that philosophy through.
>>
>>
>> Um ... OK ... But just *why* should she believe this fresh crop of
>> people trying to convince her, when she has every reason to
>> *disbelieve* the last crop?
>>
>> All I see is just convincing her to go into hiding with her new
>> family, as soon as she starts one.
>
>
>You don't have to convince her of the inherent wrongness of her
>philosophy, and she has however many years she's been imprisoned of
>examples of the social and "legal" consequences. What she needs to be
>able to function in society is to be convinced that her children, if
>any, are likely to suffer as she has if they aren't at least taught to
>conceal their lifestyle.
IOW, "go into hiding".
On the third hand, if you believe she's been unjustly treated ....
... Is that such a "wrong" thing?
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
|
|