[Default] On 04 Jun 2009 23:09:39 GMT, Uncle
Sky<Uncle_Sky@home.alone.invalid> typed:
>Saw this posted in another group.
>
>Just read this court document on PACER, which was filed 3 April 2009.
>Guess we have some more months to wait.
>
>Case No. I :07-CR-18-WLS
>
>The Defendant's Unopposed Motion/or a Continuance of the above-styled
>matter to the
>October 2009 trial term (Doc. 102) having been read and considered,
>the Court finds:
>
> 1. that the Defendant has moved for this continuance pursuant to
>3161 (h)(8)(B)(ii) -maintaining that this particular prosecution "is
>so unusual [and] [] complex, due
>to ... the nature of the prosecution, [] [and] the existence of novel
>questions of fact or law, that it []
>[would be] unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for. . .the
>trial itself within the time limit[]
>established", which is currently the June 2009 trial term; and,
>
> 2. that counsel for the Defendant represents that the government
>does not oppose the instant
>request for a continuance;
>
> THEREFORE, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by the
>granting of this
>continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in
>a speedy trial.
>
> The Court having made the foregoing findings, the Defendant's
>Motion for Continuance
>(Doc. 102) is hereby GRANTED and the matter is hereby continued to the
>October 2009 trial term
>of the Albany Division of the Middle District of Georgia.
>
> IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time period occasioned by this
>continuance is excluded
>from the calculations of time contemplated by the Speedy Trial Act, 18
>
> So ORDERED this 3rd day of April, 2009.
>
> W. Louis Sands
> United States District Judge
Thanks, Uncle Sky.
--
David
No email replies please.
You will always get the greatest recognition for the job you least like.
|
|