Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Joe33 <None@NoWay.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.tvshows
Subject: Re: Brad22222 - About Me
X-Newsreader: NewsLeecher v7.0 Final (http://www.newsleecher.com)
References: <595af91b$0$56172$c3e8da3$b1356c67@news.astraweb.com>
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <TTM6B.222232$wG1.19438@fx37.iad>
X-Complaints-To: http://www.newsleecher.com/support/
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:38:59 UTC
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:38:59 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 3375
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2244594928
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.tvshows:1628
In reply to "Brad222222" who wrote the following:
> Why I Post.
> I want to post so much good stuff on the newsservers that it will bring more
> people back to usenet.
> Why I hang out in a mostly emtpy group.
> It makes it easier for me to keep track of my posts.
> most people find my posts via nzb index sites.
> I read all messages posted in this group
> Why I rarely reply to messages.
> newbin has only basic messaging services.
> I will only reply if I have something to add to a message.
> why are some of my posts are partially obfuscated.
> nzb indexs are great but they also make it easier for the posts to be taken
> down.
> my posts can be easy read in the group but harder to find using simple nzb
> indexs.
> why I use 20% pars.
> because newsservers lose a little bit over time.
> if you have ever tried to download a file and find that 5% par set is just 1%
> short of completion. over and over again.
> hopefuly my posts will be on this group for more that 7 years and they will be
> complete for the duration of thier existence.
> why I post the 720p x265 format.
> small size, ideal for playing on small handheld devices.
> I prefer not to repost anything that is still on usenet.
> I tend to post, files that have never been posted to usenet.
> or files that were posted to usenet more that 5 years ago or longer.
> I am only interested in TV Shows.
> usenet can be the multimedia repository for all mankind.
> we just have to keep reposting stuff every 5-7 years.
> Brad22222
Thanks so much for all these HEVC posts. Your rationale makes perfect sense.
I'm grabbing almost all of what you're posting, parlty because your posts are
coming along at exactly the right time. I've been leeping SD encodes because
originally HD was so very much larger, and often not even available. But here's
a comparison.
Parks and Recreation Season 1:
Old SD encode 2.8GB
Recent 1080p AVC encode 23.8GB
Your 1080p HEVC encode 3.7GB
(And if I compared HEVC 720p to SD, the HEVC would be the smaller files.)
Now that people have experience with tuning HEVC and you're able to get just as
good an image, AND it takes maybe ten percent of the old file size, I'm updating
old stuff and keeping new stuff. I see some of the release groups moving to
HEVC, and man is that a welcome change in the age of ISP data caps.
I personally generally don't save recordings marred by network advertising
logos, but the large majority of yours are logo free, and many even retain the
subtitles. Superb stuff.
Thanks again for all the postings. I've spread the word and I know you've got
fans!
--
----------------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Final
Free Newsreader @ http://www.newsleecher.com/
------------------------------- ----- ---- -- -
|
|