On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:31:30 -0400, Batman <TheB@t.Cave> wrote:
>In article <a0ht0c9oj0vvi7kuohbfh66b2tbvkddm6q@4ax.com>, Me@Here.com
>says...
>>
>> I implore you to not move again, at least not to the former boy group
>> you indicated. Not only was that group dropped by a great many NSP's
>> free or paid, posts can't even be searched for on most NZB
>> websites.This group seems to be relatively spam free; we request that
>> you please continue your restoration of Usenet here.
>
>Please calm down, my friend.
>
>We have reasons for the things we do. The decision to do a post in that
>formerly active group had some logic behind it. Obviously you cannot
>know what we are thinking, and we do not intend to explain or defend our
>decisions. You either live with them, or you don't. It's entirely up to
>you. There is material in that group, and if you want it, you know what
>you need to do.
>
>We have already stated we will complete the post over there and move on,
>so there's no cause for alarm. It's not intended to be something
>permanent, it's an experiment. We have conducted a number of
>experiments; some worked out very well and some didn't. We learn things
>in the process.
>
>It is inevitable that spiderhacker will be spammed. The Post Description
>spammer was already here once, and we find it quite amazing they haven't
>returned. They will surely be back at some point, and when that happens
>we will depart this group immediately, as we always do.
>
>vs lbh frnepu sbe bhe cerggl snprf cbfgf lbh jvyy trg na vqrn bs jung
>gur shgher znl ubyq
Thank you very much for the clarification and the tip.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.spiderhacker/245', 'Re: Get the picture? - [6/6] - "a6.jpg" (1/1)')){kind=link}