Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.new-age
Subject: Re: 16 BIT vs 24 BIT
From: Randy <am70sguyMUNGE@NOSPAMyahoo.com>
References: <8661i95vc46tcvjnlrpskjjhc2q2lq1ofr@4ax.com> <56babf95$0$30435$b1db1813$5cfd346e@news.astraweb.com> <okqmbbhnir51mrvak1mlkjjsp3h6h52kfa@4ax.com> <XnsA5AAB88B7DF2Dam70sguyyahoo.com@69.16.179.29> <20uobbl8o7f9iaks2h1djaru1bemp7ls3g@4ax.com> <XnsA5AC651F52472am70sguyyahoo.com@69.16.179.29>
Message-ID: <XnsA5B1466238Aam70sguyyahoo.com@69.16.179.29>
User-Agent: Xnews/2009.05.01
Lines: 13
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:01:39 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:01:39 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1046722079
X-Received-Bytes: 1419
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.new-age:2992
Randy <am70sguyMUNGE@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in
news:XnsA5AC651F52472am70sguyyahoo.com@69.16.179.29:
>
> Maybe the newer computers handle 24-bit nowadays. used to be they only
> handled 16-bit too. I'm not as prone to stay up to date on the technology
> and updates as I once was
Hmmm, turns out 24-bit has been supported on computers for a heck of a lot
longer than I thought. Guess I should think about speakers?
--
Randy
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|