In reply to "betaman" who wrote the following:
> On 10 Feb 2016 04:41:57 GMT, d(-_-)b Who?? <who@whatwhere.invalid> wrote:
>
> > In reply to "Griffin" who wrote the following:
> >
> > > I was wondering if anyone prefers, or even downloads, 24 BIT music?
> > >
> > > There isn't any point in posting something if no one downloads it,
> > > IMHO.
> > >
> > > I can't really tell any difference between the two. But that could be
> > > because of my modestly priced stereo or my old ears - or both ;^)
> > >
> > > I appreciate any input.
> > >
> > > Griffin
> >
> > We use to like mp3s, then we liked flac.
> > 24bit 192khz flac is the next level best now.
> > I'm in my 60s & I hear they are way better.
> > 24bit 44khz is as low as 24 goes & isn't that much better.
> > Try some 192s! a.b.lossless.24bit has lots of them.
>
> hi,
> i see that the world will continue without me
> i have recuperated just fine (almost)
> i have new respect for my body
>
> they gave me iv morphine in the hospital and also percocets every four hours
> there are two active ingredients in opium
> morphine and codeine... they make the percocet with the codeine
> if they just gave me the opium,
> we could have all saved a lot of money and trouble
> but no one asks me
> too bad
> i seem to be the only one that knows
>
> as far as converting to 24 bit
> i have this to say about that
> most of the time, i can't tell the difference
> many times, the 24 bit recording is of something that was never engineered
> with such precision in the first place
> like from conventional mike, recording or editing equipment, conversions, or
> whatever
> i mean, i don't even believe that a lot of the 24 bit makes a better
> difference
> to younger people that can hear better than i hear
> i wear reading glasses, probably don't hear as well either,
> i also am sixty years and counting
>
> but maybe sometimes it really does make a difference and its special
> i can play it all
> i might prefer the 24 bit many times
> its always welcome
> it couldn't hurt
> its gotta have better shelf life
> the only drawback is the extra cpu to play it, or convert it for cheaper phone
> appz
> and the extra space to store it
> i don't have to convert all my old cds to 24 bit
> that would more than double my current 8 terrabytes of music storage, with
> backup
> and thats nothing compared to my movies and tv
> the only thing good about collecting, is that i actually watch much less of
> the tv
> i spend more time collecting it
> most of which i am pretty sure i will never watch
> you'd think i'd be smarter by now
>
> anyway
> the 24 bit stuff that is posted i usually think at least someone thinks is
> special
> many times, a prolific artist will only have a couple of 24 bits cds,
> and those are usually his best or most popular works
>
> its good to see such a big collection here in newsgroups
> i try to sift and see which ones i like
> the latest one i am listening to now is
> Electrix - 2014 III
>
> so thats for that
> its good to see randy and griffith still doing that you do
>
> i haven't really woken up yet
> i just wanted to check in and say thanks
>
> and say that yes, i do have more room for a few 24bit flac
>
> |3etaman
>
> ps -
>
> mobi and epub are to pdf what mp3 is to wav
Hey bataman!
I hear ya. Got a ton of movies I'll never watch too.
The PDF reff made me smile!
We used to have ISP news servers with 24 hour retention.
Now we have 7 years!
We had VCD, SVCD, DVD & Now have MKVs.
I bought a LazerDisc player & HD-DVD player OUCH!
I never bought a SACD player & am glad to get the files here in the usenet!
Any good sound card or motherboard can handle them NP.
Get weel & Stay well!
d(-_-)b Who??
--
--------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Beta 10
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
------------------- ----- ---- -- -
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|