Griffin wrote:
>
>Please try to be more understanding Sawbuck. Who dat? is 71, and new
>to posting.
My original query was nothing more than that, a query, and
included help for Who dat? to understand lossless better (a
pointer to lossless.free.fr - excellent resource for
newbies). The response is this crossposted screencap that
omits the group where the original upload and query actually
are (absl.flac). It's simply rude, not to mention
irrelevant to the 4 groups that got the screencap without
explanation. Newbie and/or being 71 doesn't excuse
rudeness.
>But at least he is trying
Yes, it was recognition of this very point that prompted me
to reply to Who dat? in the first place. The goal was (and
is) to help him become a good and respected poster instead
of one that will likely end up in at least some killfiles.
>when the number of posters are getting fewer
>by the day. (Even you were a newbie once upon a time.)
Yes of course I was, but never a rude newbie and I had the
sense to learn about usenet and binary posting before
leaping in. That's what FAQS, guides and test groups are
for. Constructive criticsm is useful too, for those willing
to listen.
>BTW, thank you for your many posts in the classical lossless group
>Sawbuck. They are much appreciated ;^)
Most kind of you to say, thank you.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.new-age/1744', 'Re: Explanation of Highbitrate *.flac...EAC has a bitrate choice...see *.jpg snag attached, for those who need an explanation. WD? 01 file "Flac Highbitrate Selection EAC.jpg" (1/1) yEnc 68448 Bytes')){kind=link}