On Sat, 09 May 2015 19:58:06 -0700, Sawbuck <2fins4@a.sawbuck> wrote:
>Who dat? <Who dat?@Watch It!.com> wrote:
>
>nothing in the message body of his crosspost to 4 groups,
>none of which is where I replied to one of his binary
>uploads asking for an explanation. (absl.flac which I have
>added to this crosspost).
> Message-ID: <o88ska1l6v53aobju0ih5md0v157n705p0@4ax.com>
> References: <Vcd3x.140113$pO4.14615@fx18.iad>
>
>Methinks my attempt to have a conversation with Who dat? is
>futile. Conversations happen in the message body and in the
>original newsgroup where they began.
>But I'll try once again.
>
>http://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=EAC_and_FLAC
>
>scroll down to the screencap of compression options where it
>says
>
>/quote
> Do not worry what bit rate is shown in the bit rate
>drop down box; this will be ignored, as will the quality
>setting chosen below it.
>/endquote
>
>Now do you understand my query? ?? Do you? Why are you
>proclaiming high bitrate flac? Your claim is clear evidence
>you don't understand what this means. High bitrate refers
>to LOSSY format. NOT LOSSLESS.
>
>
>
>
Please try to be more understanding Sawbuck. Who dat? is 71, and new
to posting.
But at least he is trying when the number of posters are getting fewer
by the day. (Even you were a newbie once upon a time.)
BTW, thank you for your many posts in the classical lossless group
Sawbuck. They are much appreciated ;^)
If you have any questions Who dat? just send me an email, and I will
send you an email if I have any advice.
Griffin
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.new-age/1743', 'Re: Explanation of Highbitrate *.flac...EAC has a bitrate choice...see *.jpg snag attached, for those who need an explanation. WD? 01 file "Flac Highbitrate Selection EAC.jpg" (1/1) yEnc 68448 Bytes')){kind=link}