scheme I use in my posts. The first complaint came with this request:
I get my posts from several different sources, and usually they
are anonymous. So there is no one to ask. But even if I could ask, I
would not. Why would someone that is doing something on their own
time, and for no remuneration, make a change for me?
Why would someone that is doing something for free, and on their own
time, have to prove anything?
Secondly, is there anything that I could type that would prove it?
But I will give it a try.
This is part of an email that a fellow poster sent to me in November
of 2013:
have is to shorten up the introduction a bit so the track name at the
to have my tracks have full names (Artist/Album/Track #/Title), I tend
to keep the introduction very short, e.g., Artist/year/@ Bitrate/NMR
indicate the number of tracks and what track is being posted. Then I
put the entire file name (#F). I prefer to keep my tracks with the
entire file name so when people download more than one cd, the cds
will stay separate rather than end up with all the 1 tracks together,
Then another non-poster made this statement:
help is an interesting philosophy. Best of luck to you.
Complaints from non-posters carry NO weight with me. The next
time that I receive a complaint from a non-poster I will plonk them.
internet, here is the definition (per Wikipedia):
Plonk is a Usenet jargon term for adding a particular poster to one's
kill file such that the poster's future postings are completely
ignored.
Griffin
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|