On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 04:29:33 -0500, Bismarck <bnwink@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Mar 12, 2018, The Mad Doctor wrote
>(in article<s3tdad5hnd8lccnfnh7ct6fos5mkeo7en8@4ax.com>):
>
>> two questions:
>>
>> You put AATW as your #2 fav... who's #1 ??
>>
>> and, just curious... are/were you a Ray Charles fan?
>>
>> As you may have figured out.... all though I do one hell of a lot of
>> "quality" posting... it's mostly in MP3 (or dozens
>> of reasons) and usually only post lossless if (a) in my opinion the
>> difference is remarkable and/or (b) someone has
>> asked for sumpin'.
>>
>> Gawd! after the mess I saw this morning (in either the 60's or 50's mp3
>> group) from two of the self-appointed God's
>> (for that group) were one is posting (f you can believe it) 64kbps crap and
>> the other (who has sworn for years that
>> he/she only posts legit CDs and NEVER, EVER up converts) made a big boo-boo
>> and accidentally posted hi/her "work folder"
>> with all the sub-par bits and pieces he/she was obviously using to "create"
>> the contents of a requested CD.
>>
>> anyway.. after seeing that mess I hate to remain associated with that group.
>> I'd love to call out both of them but am
>> not in a trollish mood and don't need to get flamed for the next month or so.
>>
>> Okay... sorry... end of my daily rant :(
>
>#1 would be Willie Nelson. Ya, I know, lately quality is an issue. I fell in
>love with Red Headed Stranger and I was hooked.
>
>I have an extensive Ray Charles collection. Fine performer.
>
>Flac is Flac, you almost always get the quality you expect, and it is
>I rip something to MP3 to put on the player in the car, I use 256. When I
>download MP3 I prefer to get 320.
I've acquired some R Charles that I've never seen before so gonna post 'em to lossless 50-60s anyway during next few
weeks... no prob if you already have 'em.
The Mad Doctor
Always remember..
Those who computers would destroy,
they must first drive insane.
|
|