Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!lightspeed!lightspeed.eweka.nl!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!peer03.am1!peering.am1!peer02.fr7!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx13.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tarkus@here.com
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sleazemovies
Subject: Re: it ain't broke
Message-ID: <56dms9t6fbthpvdkmklec7ick11ibf6me7@4ax.com>
References: <XnsA36FBFFBF7877trastrastras@69.16.179.26>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 23:21:40 -0400
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2109121472
X-Received-Bytes: 1855
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.sleazemovies:33
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 01:52:10 GMT, mjello <non.compos@ment.is> wrote:
>> it would probably not be the worst thing to have
>> some sort of guidelines
>
>or maybe it would
By guidelines I was thinking more along the lines that just because
Megan Fox is in a couple of Transformers movies does not extend her
sleaziness to the move itself, albeit that Transformer films are utter
crap.
Specifically I was talking out loud in response to Clive's question
about two possible films. I understand his desire to contribute but
at the same time even if it there is a really loose definition of
sleaze, (which is fine), it should hopefully still fall within some
context. In Clive's situation he suggested two films and one is a
quality product while the other is definite sleaze, modern sleaze but
still sleaze.
Certainly I am not interested in seeing us imposing any sort of rule
set that reduces the posting.
|
|