On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:46:14 GMT, mjello <non.compos@ment.is> wrote:
>Tarkus@here.com wrote in news:l8mhu9la4t780kkknb88f7d6fc9vdg03r0@4ax.com:
>
>> better version
>
>better version?
>
>What's the difference between a good version of something
>that's unspeakably vile and a bad version of something that's
>unspeakably vile?
Maybe the benefit lies in how better versions save the environment...
you know better visuals lead to faster climax thus reducing the amount
of tissue paper thus reducing the number of trees that have to be cut
down?
Point taken though.
T.
|
|