Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-02.inet.qwest.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.112.MISMATCH!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx05.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Clive <Clive@Outdoors.Com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sleazemovies
Subject: Re: Ping Tarkus
Message-ID: <3h2ms95e6pllia8k4ggu4b64mbddghq4lm@4ax.com>
References: <pbljs9d19b6cp8hk7m8kuq8ouhpg1802k7@4ax.com> <os0ls9d1og231iuborbpb2l3j5e1gsft4o@4ax.com> <t92ls9hdluhcbuahn4i4jvfdavpkrol3be@4ax.com> <624ls95b6eeoan82mhphtujjqmk6273p42@4ax.com> <XnsA36F731B38F78trastrastras@69.16.179.27> <83fls9968qbk3dft5t2emkntn81ofmoibd@4ax.com> <XnsA36F83BD69628trastrastras@69.16.179.27> <pglls99iaatbif6fl6pn2hmuth1o66itq1@4ax.com> <lnnls9hr513vtbp139t6d54rhe2am1t2cn@4ax.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 20:16:41 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2549
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2093559627
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.sleazemovies:31
On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 17:13:02 -0400, Tarkus@here.com wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 16:35:56 -0400, Clive <Clive@Outdoors.Com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 19:56:50 GMT, mjello <non.compos@ment.is> wrote:
>>
>>>Tarkus@here.com wrote in news:83fls9968qbk3dft5t2emkntn81ofmoibd@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> alt.porn vs. alt.notporn debate.
>>>
>>>It sure would be nice to hear some other voices....
>>>
>>>It's not exactly what you're talking about, but "sleazy" was part of my
>>>vocabulary decades ago and it meant cheap, disreputable, sordid, shabby,
>>>etc., i.e., it had nothing to do with salacity or eroticism. Hotels could
>>>be sleazy. Some characters were sleazy. Movies were not sleazy, but they
>>>might be about sleazy characters in sleazy hotels.
>>>
>>>It sure would be nice to hear some other voices....
>>
>>I agree that more voices on the topic would be nice and thanks to you
>>both for you input. I don't think I'll ever have anything that meets
>>the 60-70 grindhouse, unless of course I've gotten it here. I'm fine
>>with not posting here, so long as those who do post know that I
>>appreciate all they do and would post if I could...
>
>I don't think there needs to be lock out of anything post 1979 but at
>the same time simply because there is a lesbian scene or a boob shot
>hardly makes it sleaze these days.. ;)
>
>Ie: TFE seems pretty sleazy to me.
ok, I think I get it, but I may ask your opinion on stuff in the
future. I'll post TFE shortly.
|
|