In reply to "Tarkus@here.com" who wrote the following:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 06:40:53 -0500, Kraken <kraken@seamonsters.com>
> wrote:
>
> > In reply to "Tarkus@here.com" who wrote the following:
> >
> > > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0243776/
> > >
> > > Pretty awful movie but then again pretty awful quality.
> > >
> > > Just another of those softcore exploitation biker films akin to
> > > Sleazy Rider a little rape that naturally turns into a consensual act.
> > >
> > > T.
> >
> > I have the uncropped, slightly longer SWV version of this if onyone wants
> > it.
>
> How much longer is it? I came across another version about 6 months
> ago but the quality was no better and near as I could tell it was
> simply re-encoded such that what was a 600 MB file was now 1.5 GB? If
> you think there is some beneift, other than the cropping which again
> given the quality this is not going to look any better on a TV screen
> regardless then please fire it up! ; )
>
> I always found this film to be odd, kind of like Sleazy Rider, in that
> they are so close to hardcore, (probably a few on set slip ins), you
> have to wonder why they didn't just go all the way?
The one you posted appears to have the beginning missing, I haven't watched them
side by side the whole way through so I'm not sure of other differences in
content, the colour is different as well. I'll post it anyway and you can make
up your own mind whether it's any good or not.
--
--------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v6.5 Beta 4
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
------------------- ----- ---- -- -
|
|