Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-03.inet.qwest.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.111.MISMATCH!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx22.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: klattu <uknow@home.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sleazemovies
Subject: Re: Dont worry about Krackhead's sporge and Robin Hood's linkspam <-- someone has maturity issues?
Message-ID: <oaos9adropffpnoleuustq9ksn9fahnuts@4ax.com>
References: <549d855a$0$43529$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com> <96kr9a5kq5afjch8heiaq1re66q1c68pvl@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 07:35:46 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 02:36:08 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 2157
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3222912
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.sleazemovies:1314
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:25:11 -0500, Tarkus@here.com wrote:
>On 26 Dec 2014 15:57:14 GMT, rorschach <rorschach@inbox.com> wrote:
>
>> Looking forward to it :)
>>
>
>Right... be all impressed by a guy who shows up and posts a flood of
>which the majority of the films are TV movies and standard
>documentaries which are not remotely relevant. Then within the flood
>that is somewhat relevant reposts films already posted by the regulars
>here that are easily found via an NZB search. And then there is
>indeed some material that is on topic.
>
>NNTP is no longer a controled protocol so there is no reason whining
>about someone being off topic. Hoewver given the history the odds are
>that after this guy is gone you had better hope that Kracken, Robin
>etc. remain because these flooders have a habit of being a flash in
>the pan.
>
>So while I do not worry about this guy and out of all of his posts
>actually found two that I did not already have, (referencing material
>that is 'sleaze'), so I am far more concerned with the standqrd
>posters continuing so I am little uncertain why you would embrace
>someone who utlimately will probably finish his flood and go away or
>continue to post non-sleaze why would you embrace his infantile attack
>on two guys who are ALWAYS on topic?
>
>T
Well said....
|
|