Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pullnews.sonic-news.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!indigo.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!mauve.octanews.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:15:13 -0500
From: wave <wave@beach.nl>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Subject: Re: SGG?
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:15:22 +1200
Message-ID: <dbf6b5ts04e2199vnf261mifnegb6tu9m5@4ax.com>
References: <l4aua5pcs9f2827nq0q4q3n2e9o7s5j46l@4ax.com> <w_CdnULnqvofQTLXnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vhf0b5hmauklc7p5ditt2toqfrkag02brl@4ax.com> <dqh0b5t2q52prsvd70990p7v7qvaud4gqn@4ax.com> <s2p2b5hr3af7thdbpi8h06k6rju76g8o3o@4ax.com> <f4b3b59k3mcumhqo5kug5bknusblre5o61@4ax.com> <9tg5b5lj48qvao9lokj1m94v9al0oeoqf6@4ax.com> <8ps5b5tgvkolanrovd9kb31f7va3tarvgb@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071 trialware
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 46
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-uvB98FGVKLH1GMLDRNKTgbltg6QZPdM567hUf2jy/kZtDZ9piq72FQGHAgUgOXo0zOVtlrOMp+X9s+9!3d+filKkxTE/jVUX38GlfIkeOe9XGNJYS7J0Y/Z5j+09zGcph8PPtCL/VdmI5+hXVOO8Kp4N
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb:964
On 17 Sep 2009 21:44:02 -0500, Paddy McCarthy <erin@shore.oi> wrote:
>
>>
>>>Yes, there is something strange about it.
>>>If Modelmom was in trouble over the websites, I doubt they would be
>>>working on the new one, it looks like it's about ready to open.
>>>It's possible the billing company forced them to drop all under 18
>>>models or lose the ability to collect money, but they still should
>>>have given some explanation.
>>
>>Mom doesn't answer her e-mail from paying customers so I doubt this
>>has anything to do with a billing company.
>>
>>Can I have the url for that model review site? I'd like to know what
>>everybody is talking about for once. :-)
>>
>>TIA
>
>
>I'm not sure which site you are referring to, I was referring to
>www.brittany-marie.com.
Like I said in my other post the moderator guy on this other forum
said it was all about taking care of some urgent or serious family
business. This was someone who posted frequently on Model Mom's
forum. He was also very definite about it nothing to do with a LEA
bust or anything even similar. He said he was trying to give people
some information but not betray the family.
We can speculate about possibilities. One could be that Hope
started a new school about that time. (She graduated from grade
school before the summer holidays.) Could it be she was being bullied
about being a web model?? Model Mom gets called in by the new
school principal. End result being Hope's website gets pulled?
Model Mom gets pissed so pulls all the SGG sites because of all the
aggravation. But this is just pure speculation on my part.
I'd say that had it been a LEA type thing, you'd hardly think that
Marie would be busy setting up her new 18+ nudie site, or that Sherri
would be posting new model pix on her facebook page as I saw a day or
two ago!!
Then again it could be the CC Bill thing. I know that Verotel are
very strict about this too.
|
|