Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:23:11 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Subject: Re: did Sandi quit because she got preggers?
From: Slobman <pigeating@holyroller.org>
References: <Xns9C3648C4A629Citsmenomailcom@216.151.153.68> <u8q945deplpmthbusovr1lkpve0ptmn61e@4ax.com> <sn7b451n6u1rii3shg6fpvsgmssqukq93f@4ax.com>
Organization: The Religious Right
Message-ID: <Xns9C36EDE698E17pigeatingholyrollero@216.196.97.130>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:23:11 -0500
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-vulvnJL5PnGToH68JSB9bFoKQH8ygsoRkUVC3JUiSsgShpu+VkjRRbeKtcLu6EclYoBvHWU/8znZa0e!icet5MhYrZGg5HvRkSGjEAMLgeXuDhgUPptvug3tkKtbn5l2p1i4QAAA9mPPpR/N1WGFfoFROMR+!BTUQvdQ/
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb:789
Paddy McCarthy <erin@shore.oi> wrote in
news:sn7b451n6u1rii3shg6fpvsgmssqukq93f@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:30:48 -0400, Justanut wrote:
>
>>
>>She quit because Webeweb "went out of business".
>>As far as being pregnant-i dont know anything about that.
>>
>>On 26 Jun 2009 14:09:08 GMT, Dozer <sure@nomail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Or did she quit and qet pregnant afterwards? Just wondering?
>
> Actually, Sandi quit long before Webeweb were busted. She quit when
> her dad got busted. All of the 'Bama models stopped modeling for
> Webeweb at that time because Sandi's dad was the photographer.
> Sandi, Lily, Bunny, SammiJo, Valerie, Lacey, Lindsey, Dorie, Torie,
> Bailey, LilAmber#3, and a few others I didn't pay much attention to
> were photographed by Pierson. Allegedly, Baileys mom was the one who
> filed the complaint against him.
> He plead gulity to some cp charge even though he's apparently never
> taken a photo of an unclothed child. Last word was that he's awaiting
> sentencing pending the outcome of the Webeweb trial.
> The whole thing reeks of a setup to get the Webeweb principals.
> The US attorney who brought the charges against Webeweb admitted that
> the photographs were technically not illegal, but they needed to be
> prosecuted because they are "creeps".
> The recent photos I've seen of Sandi look more like she's become a
> bodybuilder rather than becoming pregnant. She looks thick and
> muscular not plump.
>
The minors don't have to be nude to be considered cp. It only has to be
determined that the images are being used for sexual gratification.So if
someone has a photo album with cut out images from catalogs it can be
used as evidence.he creator of the chr series was prosecuted and
convicted for producing cp, because the jury found his candid images of
fully clothed cheerleaders obscene.On the other hand there are legal
images of nude girls that fall under Child Erotica and not Child
Pornography. It depends on the prosecutor
|
|