| Re: By the way, if anyone is interested, this is WIH from Dorie |
|
| Tatjana (Tatjana@DontFall.InLove.WithA.dreamer.org) |
2009/05/26 17:38 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!pullnews.sonic-news.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!indigo.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!teal.octanews.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:38:51 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Subject: Re: By the way, if anyone is interested, this is WIH from Dorie
From: "Tatjana" <Tatjana@DontFall.InLove.WithA.dreamer.org>
References: <x62dnaZio91ld4TXnZ2dnUVZ8i-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <Xns9C175FA9C6A64gregtohmailcom@127.0.0.1> <Pa2dnUh87vEbmIHXnZ2dnUVZ8i6dnZ2d@giganews.com> <Xns9C17C1F9E4656gregtohmailcom@127.0.0.1>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:38:53 GMT
X-Newsreader: News Rover 14.2.0
Message-ID: <Gd2dnUzVSP0W4IHXnZ2dnUVZ8sqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 29
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-FZvBBrxAiSqBA/CcId0tLD43PmH+o+XPJ3l7p2qJZ4KzbO1JayuB7rwgQamJSIaC2+Zj0fWGAoq6M1c!pbINjVU6G2l2YBDQoRn7D1ieeQJVEb5AkglsKLpf7CywmlE9aCMf7W2vKgr8dWWj2PV0Ezcr6J4=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb:562
On 27-May-2009, Greg <greg@tohmail.com> wrote:
> ok, you were right, there are some numeration differences. Namely, your
> set 76 is my Bonus 1, so you don't need that one, after all.
> Unfortunately,
> that would also mean you don't have set 76 (from my numbering point of
> view, of course). I'm attaching the thumbs you seem to be missing for
> your
> index (credits to Ape Librarian for these thumbs).
>
> As for set 16, I was talking about Tori's set 16 (shot with Dorie), not
> Dorie's set 16 where she poses alone in a light blue bikini as you pointed
>
> out.
>
> I'm including the two pics you wanted. You'll notice that the watermark on
>
> the pics is Tori-model.com, not Dorie.
>
> So basically, if you don't mind posting set 73 to 75, that would make my
> day, and a few other collector's here too, I'm sure. Thanks again,
> Tatjana!
ROGER BEEEEP!
Start posting in 5
Tatjana
|
|
|