>On 2 May 2009 19:51:02 -0500, Paddy McCarthy <erin@shore.oi> wrote:
>
>>On 02 May 2009 07:48:42 GMT, Hessy <Hessy@Hessy.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is Usenet Dead? - File 02 of 55 - All photos-fd0000.jpg (1/1)
>>
>>Nice pics, but they aren't Webeweb models.
>>The reason we have different newsgroups with different topics is so
>>that people can find what they are looking for easier.
>>People who are looking for Webeweb models might look in the Webeweb
>>group for instance, and hope to find Webeweb models there.
>>
>>Persons looking for games might look in a games group, those looking
>>for music could look in a music group and find music there.
>>Lets suppose you like a variety of different music and the general
>>music group suits your tastes perfectly, but some others only like
>>classical, some only like rock, some only like country.
>>
>>What you are doing is the same as if you posted rock music in a group
>>that was created for country music.
>>Sure, there may be one or two that like rock as well as country, but
>>most would appreciate it if you kept your rock music in the rock group
>>and left the country music group for those who are looking for country
>>music.
>>
>>You should be posting your material in a group that is either
>>specifically for the type of material that you are posting, OR a group
>>that is for a variety of different material.
>>You should not be posting your material in a group that has a very
>>specific topic like Webeweb.
>>
>>... And the answer to your question is No, usenet is not dead.
>
>
>What's that noise I hear? Sounds like someone beating their head
>against the wall.
Yeah...but it feels so good when you stop. ;-)
|
|
')){kind=link}