On 2 May 2009 19:51:02 -0500, Paddy McCarthy <erin@shore.oi> wrote:
>On 02 May 2009 07:48:42 GMT, Hessy <Hessy@Hessy.com> wrote:
>
>> Is Usenet Dead? - File 02 of 55 - All photos-fd0000.jpg (1/1)
>
>Nice pics, but they aren't Webeweb models.
>The reason we have different newsgroups with different topics is so
>that people can find what they are looking for easier.
>People who are looking for Webeweb models might look in the Webeweb
>group for instance, and hope to find Webeweb models there.
That is frikken genius right there.
>
>Persons looking for games might look in a games group, those looking
>for music could look in a music group and find music there.
>Lets suppose you like a variety of different music and the general
>music group suits your tastes perfectly, but some others only like
>classical, some only like rock, some only like country.
This is amazing. I love country music.
>
>What you are doing is the same as if you posted rock music in a group
>that was created for country music.
>Sure, there may be one or two that like rock as well as country, but
>most would appreciate it if you kept your rock music in the rock group
>and left the country music group for those who are looking for country
>music.
What would one do if it was like a crossover song that was a little bit country and a little bit
rock ?
>
>You should be posting your material in a group that is either
>specifically for the type of material that you are posting, OR a group
>that is for a variety of different material.
>You should not be posting your material in a group that has a very
>specific topic like Webeweb.
>
>... And the answer to your question is No, usenet is not dead.
Paddy
I do admire your patience in answering his post.
I suspect he already knows this information as he has been shopping this material all over the
groups for a couple years now.
I think he may actually be an anti and is making some kind of statement, but I am too dumb to figure
it out.
|
|
')){kind=link}