On 2008-10-15 15:32:05 -0700, "Roger Dean - RD" <misterdean@hushmail.com> said:
> Ape Librarian <bite@banana.org> wrote in
> news:mnocf4lma7m0dmkjeb9sgqjkb4i5v70gks@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:22:14 -0400, user <user@domain.org> wrote:
>>
>>> well, there's always been talk of "secret" groups. i went trolling
>>> through my alt.binaries.* list and found some interesting ones, but
>>> nothing with any real substance.
>>>
>>>>>>> On 11-Oct-2008, Justanut wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I hate to be a spoil sport, but isnt she kind of old for us now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not when she's 'posing' with an Alsatian dog.
>>>>>>> See Custom Set 259, on the secret group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nick Tait.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, its awesome ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RD
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> and hints as to the group name?
>>>>
>>>> Oh. My. God. Tell me you're kidding. PLEASE. :-)
>>
>>
>> That's pretty much the point of why we're yanking people's chains
>> here.
>>
>> There's so many people out there convinced that there are "secret"
>> groups, but they don't exist. So every time someone "accidentally"
>> mentions a "secret group," some goober always swallows the bait. Then
>> the rest of us just follow along. :)
>>
>> There was a different group recently when poster A said to poster B
>> "I'll see you in the other group," meaning a different *regular* group
>> where they both routinely posted. Nothing more. Some yutz decided
>> there were talking about a "secret group," and became quite agitated
>> when no one divulged the info. In fact, the more people laughed at
>> him, the more over the top and vulger he got! Git.
>>
>> He'd never posted anything in that group, which made it even funnier.
>>
>>
>
> Thats exactly what i said in a.b.s.f.g
>
> RD
Now I assume a.b.s.f.g. is a joke too. What's that stand for? :p
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|