Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Subject: Re: Just a note to Ape
From: Hessy <Hessy@Hessy.com>
References: <Xns9BF6988862C54Hessyhessycom@193.202.122.115> <JJGdnT0XfJACUW3UnZ2dnUVZ_jRi4p2d@giganews.com>
Organization: HessyBaby
Message-ID: <Xns9BF69F2D07B04Hessyhessycom@193.202.122.137>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Date: 23 Apr 2009 20:38:48 GMT
Lines: 67
NNTP-Posting-Host: f0d04e6e.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=?Rl<0KaTQf6fB5aLm@JgR<L?0kYOcDh@:PN@6U9k?0P5KR\nYN01_T7jC?h_dm^oM8;4@W<icinZ42IPf`S31a9:l@gV8R1F;l<
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb:394
news:JJGdnT0XfJACUW3UnZ2dnUVZ_jRi4p2d@giganews.com:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:59:37 +0000, Hessy wrote:
>
>> There are no groups nor or there anything off-topic. Usenet is the
>> oldest form of the Internet - less than 1% of all folks even use it
>> anymore - hence I believe AT&T is the last major ISP that even carries
>> Usenet. A premium Usenet provider required. Go to Flickr and type in
>> checkers - a million posts will appear. Old Goat presented an
>> interesting compromise by posting on my part a sample pic. So I
decided
>> to run with it - it saves me bandwidth of posting, keeps the dreaded
>> spammers away - and I get to post.
>>
>> The problem with posting this way - is that my videos are innocent -
so
>> that if someone asks for the full file - US federal law being what it
is
>> - I could be facilitating pornography if the person who requested it
had
>> a hardon looking at girlies running around and having fun.
>>
>> I enjoy photography and my subjects are girls. I post them in no bad
>> way. This post has the sample and original so no one can ask.
>>
>> You tread on dangerous water if you take and post pictures. I use a
>> Hi-8 Cam and just bought a Digital Cam - but it is too crisp - so I
>> soften it to be Film-like through my software. I am sorry you feel
the
>> way you do.
>>
>>
>> bye
>>
>> The original is 200+MB per minute it is a compromise what is being
>> posted - fairly reasonable. The MPEG version is a little crisper -
but
>> the DVD capture the best. I hope you enjoy
>
>
> You are a complete moron. Not only do you have absolutely ZERO grasp of
> what is and how to use usenet, intent has zero to do with whether or
not
> something is "porn" in the US (and chicago, where you are).
>
> Your videos are FAR from "innocent." Go on believing the lie you tell
> yourself that your retarded sexuality is "innocent" - it will do you no
> good when someone recognizes their kid and the cops come knocking...
> which, if we are fortunate, will be very soon.
>
> You are alone. Kill yourself and end the misery.
>
I feel like answering for the F of it. Any photograph. movie, likeness
etc if captured, produced, manufactured, etc if be in a Public Location
no person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Conversion of the
likeness, etc without monetary gain into any other format is also
permissable. In Illinois where you claim I am at - and am not - I would
violate the law by capturing Sound as that would be considered
wiretapping. I live in a state where sound can be captured if only one
party has knowledge of sound being captured. Since I remove sound before
transport over Interstate Lines - no federal or state violation.
A lot of these files are old and the girls have children themselves now.
The files are totally innocent and you prove my point by seeing something
into them that the camera never did. You need help.
|
|